8.8 KiB
ESPectre (Francesco Pace) — Technique Reference
Source: How I Turned My Wi-Fi Into a Motion Sensor — Part 2 (Dec 2025), Medium / francescopace/espectre on GitHub, GPLv3.
Captures the three core techniques and the support tooling Pace shipped. RuView has adopted some, partially adopted others, and not adopted the rest. This doc is a living checklist — update when items move.
1. Gain Lock (AGC + FFT scale)
The ESP32 PHY applies automatic gain control per packet. For normal WiFi reception that keeps decoding optimal; for CSI sensing it manifests as a 20-30 % slow drift in amplitude even in an empty room, masking real body modulation. Two undocumented PHY routines freeze the gain:
extern void phy_fft_scale_force(bool force_en, int8_t force_value);
extern void phy_force_rx_gain(int force_en, int force_value);
Recipe:
- After WiFi association, collect AGC and FFT gain values from each CSI packet.
- At packet 300 (~3 s at 100 pps), take the median of each (more robust than mean against outliers).
- Call the two PHY routines with the medians to lock the radio.
- Safety branch: if median AGC < 30, skip the lock — forcing low gain freezes the RX path. Sensor must be moved further from AP.
Supported targets: ESP32-S3, ESP32-C3, ESP32-C5, ESP32-C6. Older parts have no access to these PHY hooks.
RuView status — DONE. ADR-100 (commit 8aef8206).
Implemented in firmware/esp32-csi-node/main/csi_collector.c as
rv_gain_lock_process. Boot log on both sensors:
gain-lock APPLIED: AGC=42/44, FFT=-31/-42 (median of 300 packets).
Empty-room CV dropped from ~10 % (full broadband) to 3-4 % after
NBVI also kicked in.
2. NBVI — Normalized Baseline Variability Index
Per-subcarrier score that picks the K most useful subcarriers automatically.
NBVI(k) = α · (σ_k / μ_k²) + (1 - α) · (σ_k / μ_k), α = 0.5
σ_k / μ_k²penalises weak subcarriers (low μ → high score → bad).σ_k / μ_kis the standard coefficient of variation; rewards stability.- α = 0.5 balances; pure σ/μ² picks stable-but-quiet bins, pure σ/μ picks loud-but-noisy bins.
- Amplitude-only (no phase) — phase has Temporal Phase Rotation artefacts that need extra calibration; amplitude is calibration- free.
Four-step pipeline at boot:
| Step | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Find quiet moments | Slide a window across the calibration buffer, pick the windows with the lowest aggregate variance via percentile detection. Tolerates someone walking through during boot. |
| 2 | Dead-zone gate | Drop any subcarrier with mean amplitude below the 25th percentile across all subcarriers. Guard tones + null bins are excluded so they don't "win" σ/μ² → ∞. |
| 3 | Rank + validate | Sort by NBVI ascending. Run the motion detector on each candidate config, measure false-positive rate, take the config with the lowest FP. |
| 4 | Pick winners | Top-K by lowest NBVI (typically K = 12 for HT20). |
Memory: O(N) running with on-the-fly mean/variance updates ⇒ ≈ 256 B for 64 subcarriers. Time: O(N · L) per recompute, milliseconds on a $10 device.
RuView status — PARTIALLY DONE. ADR-102 (commit 2f12a223).
Server-side port in amp_presence_override /
nbvi_select_top_k. What we have:
- ✅ NBVI formula with α = 0.5
- ✅ Top-12 selection
- ✅ Dead-zone gate (
NBVI_DEAD_GATE_PCT = 0.25) - ✅ Recompute throttled (
NBVI_REFRESH_TICKS = 200≈ every 5 s)
What we do not have:
- ❌ Step 1 quiet-window finder — we use the whole history buffer. If the buffer captures someone moving, ranking is biased. Pace's percentile-window detector should be added.
- ❌ Step 3 FP-rate validation — we accept the raw NBVI ranking without testing it on the calibration data.
- ❌ Boot calibration sequence (FW-side, 7 s post gain-lock). Ours is server-side rolling, which means selection drifts forever rather than locking after boot. Trade-off: adapts to room rearrangement, but never "settles".
Empirically on the operator's deployment NBVI alone gave a 1.5-2× CV reduction:
| Full 56 subc | NBVI top-12 | |
|---|---|---|
| node 1 idle CV | 5.0 % | 3.1 % |
| node 2 idle CV | 7.0 % | 3.9 % |
3. Baseline-variance threshold normalization
Pace's third problem was that threshold = 1.0 meant different
things on different devices. Fix:
if baseline_variance > 0.25:
scale = 0.25 / baseline_variance
else:
scale = 1.0
Reference 0.25 is what a quiet room typically measures during NBVI
calibration. Apply the scale to the live motion score, so the user-
facing threshold (= 1.0) is universal across rooms.
RuView status — NOT DONE. Our amp_node_level uses fixed
thresholds tuned to one deployment (CV 10 % moving, CV 22 % active,
mean/baseline < 0.75 still). Other deployments will need re-tuning.
4. Two-phase boot calibration
PHASE 1: GAIN LOCK (3 s, 300 packets)
Collect AGC/FFT → median → lock.
PHASE 2: NBVI CALIBRATION (7 s, 700 packets)
With gain locked, rank subcarriers → pick top-K.
Total ≈ 10 s. Room must be mostly quiet during this window.
RuView status — SPLIT. Phase 1 is in FW (ADR-100). Phase 2 lives in the server as a rolling refresh, not a boot-time fix-point. See NBVI section above for the implications.
5. Persisted baseline / device threshold
After NBVI calibration, ESPectre writes the AGC/FFT lock values, the chosen subcarrier set, the baseline variance, and the threshold into NVS so reboots don't need re-calibration.
RuView status — NOT DONE. Each server restart triggers a fresh
60-second baseline learn. NBVI also re-ranks from scratch on restart.
Open item: persist AMP_LATEST.baseline to disk + load at startup.
6. Interactive Web Serial game (espectre.dev/game)
Browser ↔ ESP32 over USB Web Serial API. Shows live motion as a bar,
lets user tune threshold while playing a reaction game. Settings
persist via NVS.
RuView status — NOT DONE. Closest analogue is our raw.html
calibration console (per-node bars + RSSI trace), but it's read-only.
7. Native Home Assistant integration via ESPHome
Sensor exposes occupancy/motion entities directly to HA.
RuView status — NOT DONE. No HA integration path. Could be added via MQTT or a custom ESPHome component.
8. Test suite
Pace ships 500+ unit tests, 90 % coverage, validated against a fixed 2000-packet capture (1000 idle + 1000 motion). CI runs PlatformIO, pytest, ESPHome build, Codecov on every push.
RuView status — PARTIAL. Agent added 2 regression tests for the
binary CSI frame parser (csi.rs:751); no regression set captured
for the amplitude classifier or NBVI.
Comparison summary (what RuView has, doesn't have, has differently)
| Item | Pace / ESPectre | RuView |
|---|---|---|
| Gain lock | FW, 300 pkt median, AGC+FFT, AGC<30 skip | ✅ Same, in csi_collector.c |
| NBVI formula | α·σ/μ² + (1-α)·σ/μ, α=0.5, top-12 | ✅ Same, server-side |
| Dead-zone gate | 25th percentile of mean | ✅ NBVI_DEAD_GATE_PCT=0.25 |
| Quiet-window finder | Percentile-window in calibration buffer | ❌ Use full window verbatim |
| FP-rate validation of NBVI pick | Yes | ❌ Take raw ranking |
| Boot-time NBVI freeze | FW, ~7 s post-lock | ❌ Server-side rolling |
| Baseline variance normalization | scale = 0.25 / σ² |
❌ Fixed thresholds per deployment |
| NVS persistence of calibration | Yes | ❌ Fresh learn each restart |
| Universal threshold | One value across rooms | ❌ Re-tune per deployment |
| Calibration UI | Web Serial game | ❌ Read-only raw.html |
| HA integration | ESPHome native | ❌ None |
| Test suite | 500+ tests, 90 % coverage | ❌ ~2 parser tests only |
| Phase / amplitude | Amplitude only (TPR avoidance) | ✅ Same |
| Subcarrier count | 64 (HT20) | 56 (ESP32-S3 reports 56 non-guard) |
Open items, ranked by expected impact on RuView
- Quiet-window finder for NBVI Step 1 — if the operator restarts the server while the room is occupied, current NBVI biases its ranking toward subcarriers stable on the occupied state. Bug: present_still then under-triggers. ~1 h.
- Persist
AMP_LATEST.baselineto disk — eliminates the "step outside for 60 s" ritual after every restart. ~30 min. - Baseline variance normalization — would let us ship one threshold set for any deployment. ~1 h.
- FP-rate validation of NBVI pick — would catch the case where the top-12 ranked subcarriers happen to overlap with a noise source. ~1 h.
- Boot-time NBVI freeze — if we want fully reproducible behaviour. Trade-off: doesn't adapt to room changes. ~2 h.
- HA / ESPHome integration — depends on whether RuView wants to be a HA sensor or stay standalone. ~1 day.
- Web Serial calibration UI — nice-to-have, lower priority than the algorithmic items. ~1 day.