6.8 KiB
6.8 KiB
Neural Network Implementation Plan
Temporal Micro-Net with Sublinear Solver Integration
Executive Summary
Implementation of a temporal prediction neural network system that combines traditional micro-nets with sublinear solver gating for improved latency and stability in short-horizon predictions. The system will be deployed to HuggingFace with comprehensive benchmarking.
Project Structure
neural-network-implementation/
├── plan/ # Project planning documents
│ ├── IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ └── milestones.md
├── src/ # Source code
│ ├── models/ # Neural network models
│ │ ├── traditional_micronet.py
│ │ ├── temporal_solver_net.py
│ │ └── base_model.py
│ ├── solvers/ # Sublinear solver integration
│ │ ├── solver_gate.py
│ │ ├── projection.py
│ │ └── pagerank_selector.py
│ ├── data/ # Data processing
│ │ ├── preprocessing.py
│ │ ├── loaders.py
│ │ └── augmentation.py
│ ├── training/ # Training pipelines
│ │ ├── trainer.py
│ │ ├── active_selection.py
│ │ └── callbacks.py
│ └── inference/ # Inference engine
│ ├── predictor.py
│ ├── kalman_filter.py
│ └── quantization.py
├── tests/ # Test suite
│ ├── unit/
│ ├── integration/
│ └── performance/
├── models/ # Saved model checkpoints
├── data/ # Dataset storage
├── benchmarks/ # Benchmark results
├── configs/ # Configuration files
│ ├── A_traditional.yaml
│ ├── B_temporal_solver.yaml
│ └── common.yaml
└── docs/ # Documentation
Implementation Phases
Phase 1: Core Infrastructure (Day 1-2)
-
Base Model Architecture
- Abstract base class for micro-nets
- Common interfaces for training/inference
- Configuration management system
-
Data Pipeline
- Preprocessing for time series data
- Sliding window generation
- Z-score normalization
- Train/val/test temporal splits
-
Sublinear Solver Integration
- Wrapper for solve_projection API
- Certificate error handling
- Budget management
Phase 2: Model Implementation (Day 2-3)
-
System A - Traditional Micro-Net
- Residual GRU implementation
- TCN alternative
- FP32 training, INT8 inference
- 128ms window, 500ms horizon prediction
-
System B - Temporal Solver Net
- Same architecture as System A
- Kalman filter prior integration
- Residual learning approach
- Solver gate implementation
- Active selection with PageRank
Phase 3: Training Pipeline (Day 3-4)
-
Standard Training
- Adam optimizer setup
- MSE loss with smoothness penalty
- Early stopping on validation
- Batch size 256, 15 epochs
-
Active Selection Training
- kNN graph construction
- PageRank scoring
- Sample selection strategy
- Error-guided sampling
Phase 4: Inference Optimization (Day 4-5)
-
Latency Optimization
- INT8 quantization
- Single-core CPU optimization
- Memory pinning
- Thread locking
-
Real-time Processing
- Sub-millisecond inference
- Certificate validation
- Safe fallback mechanisms
Phase 5: Benchmarking & Evaluation (Day 5-6)
-
Performance Metrics
- MSE at 500ms horizon
- P90/P99 absolute error
- P50/P99.9 latency
- Gate pass rate
- Certificate error tracking
-
A/B Testing Framework
- Paired t-tests
- Mann-Whitney U tests
- Effect size calculation
- Statistical significance
Phase 6: HuggingFace Deployment (Day 6-7)
-
Model Packaging
- Model card creation
- Dataset documentation
- Training scripts
- Inference examples
-
Repository Setup
- Model weights upload
- Configuration files
- README and documentation
- Demo application
Technical Specifications
Model Architecture
common:
horizon_ms: 500
window_ms: 128
sample_rate_hz: 2000
features: [x, y, vx, vy]
quantize: int8
optimizer: adam
lr: 1e-3
batch: 256
epochs: 15
A_traditional:
model: micro_gru
hidden: 32
B_temporal_solver:
model: micro_gru
hidden: 32
prior: kalman
solver_gate:
eps: 0.02
budget: 200000
active_selection:
k: 15
eps: 0.03
Performance Targets
- Latency Budget (per tick):
- Ingest: 0.10ms
- Prior: 0.10ms
- Network: 0.30ms
- Gate: 0.20ms
- Actuation: 0.10ms
- Total P99.9 ≤ 0.90ms
Success Criteria
- System B reduces P99.9 latency by ≥20% OR
- System B reduces P99 error by ≥15% with equal latency
- Gate pass rate ≥90% with avg cert.error ≤0.02
Dependencies
# Core
pytorch >= 2.0
numpy >= 1.24
scipy >= 1.10
scikit-learn >= 1.3
# Optimization
onnx >= 1.14
onnxruntime >= 1.16
torch-quantization >= 2.1
# Sublinear Solver
sublinear-time-solver >= 0.1.0
# Deployment
huggingface-hub >= 0.19
transformers >= 4.35
accelerate >= 0.24
# Monitoring
tensorboard >= 2.14
wandb >= 0.16
Risk Mitigation
-
Performance Risks
- Fallback to traditional method if solver fails
- Adjustable epsilon parameters
- Multiple budget configurations
-
Training Risks
- Checkpoint saving every epoch
- Multiple seed runs
- Gradient clipping
-
Deployment Risks
- Thorough testing on diverse data
- Graceful degradation
- Version control for models
Testing Strategy
-
Unit Tests
- Model components
- Solver integration
- Data processing
-
Integration Tests
- End-to-end training
- Inference pipeline
- A/B comparison
-
Performance Tests
- Latency benchmarks
- Memory usage
- Throughput testing
Documentation Requirements
-
Code Documentation
- Docstrings for all functions
- Type hints
- Inline comments for complex logic
-
User Documentation
- Installation guide
- Training tutorial
- Inference examples
- API reference
-
HuggingFace Model Card
- Model description
- Training procedure
- Evaluation results
- Limitations and biases
- Citation information
Deliverables
-
Week 1
- Complete implementation of Systems A & B
- Training pipelines
- Basic evaluation
-
Week 2
- Full benchmarking suite
- Statistical analysis
- HuggingFace deployment
- Final documentation
Success Metrics
- ✅ Both systems fully implemented
- ✅ All tests passing
- ✅ Performance targets met
- ✅ HuggingFace model published
- ✅ Documentation complete
- ✅ Reproducible results