ADR-115 lands the dual-protocol HA integration design:
- MQTT auto-discovery (HA-DISCO) carrying full RuView telemetry
- Matter Bridge (HA-FABRIC) carrying the standardised subset across
Apple Home / Google Home / Alexa / SmartThings / HA
- Semantic Automation Primitives (HA-MIND) — 10 v1 inferred states
(someone-sleeping, possible-distress, room-active, elderly-anomaly,
meeting-in-progress, bathroom-occupied, fall-risk-elevated, bed-exit,
no-movement, multi-room-transition) that turn raw signals into HA
entities, Matter events, and Apple Home scene triggers — the inference
layer that moves RuView from "RF sensing" to "ambient intelligence
infrastructure". All 13 §9 open questions ACK'd by maintainer.
P1 (this commit) — `mqtt` and `matter` Cargo features (default off) +
20+ new CLI flags wired through cli.rs:
- --mqtt / --mqtt-host / --mqtt-port / --mqtt-username /
--mqtt-password-env / --mqtt-client-id / --mqtt-prefix /
--mqtt-tls / --mqtt-ca-file / --mqtt-client-cert / --mqtt-client-key
- --mqtt-refresh-secs / --mqtt-rate-{vitals,motion,count,rssi,pose} /
--mqtt-publish-pose
- --privacy-mode (ADR-106 primitive-isolation contract)
- --matter / --matter-setup-file / --matter-reset /
--matter-vendor-id (dev VID 0xFFF1 per §9.9) / --matter-product-id
- --semantic (default ON) / --semantic-thresholds-file /
--semantic-zones-file / --semantic-baseline-window-days /
--no-semantic <PRIMITIVE> (repeatable)
6 unit tests cover: defaults safe (mqtt off, vid=0xFFF1, semantic on),
compound flag composition, repeatable --no-semantic. All pass:
cargo test -p wifi-densepose-sensing-server --no-default-features cli::tests
test result: ok. 6 passed; 0 failed.
rumqttc 0.24 added as optional dep (gated behind `mqtt` feature) with
rustls instead of openssl for Windows parity with the rest of the
workspace. matter-rs intentionally absent until P7 spike validates the
SDK choice (§9.10).
Coordinates with ADR-110 work (different branch, different files).
This branch is feat/adr-115-ha-mqtt-matter off main. ADR-110 work
continues on adr-110-esp32c6.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
Iter 16 closes the math loop and updates ADR-110 to reflect the full
P1-P10 sprint outcome (per user request).
Code (the math layer that converts the iter 15 stored sync into a
per-frame mesh-aligned timestamp):
wifi-densepose-hardware:
SyncPacket::apply_to_local(local_at_frame_us: u64) -> u64
Pure integer math: offset = epoch - local; mesh = local_at_frame + offset.
3 new unit tests (10 total, all green):
- apply_to_local_recovers_packet_epoch (identity at the packet's local_us)
- apply_to_local_preserves_inter_frame_delta (Δlocal == Δmesh)
- apply_to_local_on_leader_is_near_identity (leader offset ≈ 0)
wifi-densepose-sensing-server:
NodeState::mesh_aligned_us(local_at_frame_us: u64) -> Option<u64>
Returns the recovered mesh timestamp using the most-recent sync
packet, or None if no sync seen or last one older than 9 s
(3× firmware VALID_WINDOW_MS = 9 s staleness gate).
cargo check -p wifi-densepose-sensing-server --no-default-features
→ green
ADR-110 substantial rewrite (per user "update adr 110 with details"):
- Status line: P1-P10 complete, firmware-side substrate closed at v0.7.0.
- Front matter now lists all 4 firmware releases + witness link.
- Phase table grows a P10 row capturing the v0.6.8 / v0.6.9 / v0.7.0
arc (EMA smoother + sync packet + bit-4 wire-fix + host crates).
- New §4.1 — /loop 5m SOTA sprint summary table (iters 1-16, 4 releases,
17 commits, 13 unit tests, what shipped each iter).
- New §4.2 — measured numbers table with 99.56% RX, 104.1 µs smoothed
stdev, 3.95x suppression, 1.4 ppm crystal skew, etc — every cell
backed by a witness §A0.x entry and a preserved bench log.
- New §4.3 — host-side production surface listing (sync_packet.rs +
sensing-server NodeState + Python parser, with file paths).
- §5 open question on 802.15.4 channel resolved (Kconfig, default ch26
not ch15, with the witness §D1 rationale).
- New §6 — explicit scope of what's outside this ADR (multistatic fusion
math in ADR-029/030, hardware-gated measurements needing INA / 11ax AP,
IDF upstream fixes pending).
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
SOTA iter 9 — closes the §A0.11 wiring gap with empirical evidence.
Added a diagnostic ESP_LOGI in the sync emit path; flashed both C6
boards; captured 45s parallel serial output.
Sync packet generation confirmed live:
COM12 (leader, ...00:84):
sync-pkt #1 ... node=12 flags=0x03 local_us=28864932 epoch_us=28864939
flags=0x03 = leader+valid, epoch ≈ local (7 µs delta = call-stack
elapsed only — leader has no offset by definition)
COM9 (follower, ...05:3c):
sync-pkt #1 ... node=9 flags=0x06 local_us=28798450 epoch_us=27634885
flags=0x06 = valid+smoothed_used, local-epoch = 1,163,565 µs
Matches §A0.10's measured -1.16 s mesh-aligned offset within 285 µs
(WiFi MAC TX jitter floor between samples).
Cadence: 2.05 s between sync packets — 20 CSI frames at the bench's
observed 10 fps rate = exactly the design intent.
UDP send returns -1 (sr=-1) because the bench boards are intentionally
not associated to a real AP (provisioned to dead SSIDs for the iter
2-8 mesh experiments). No crash, no resource leak in 45s. Once boards
hit a routable network, sr becomes the byte count.
Wiring gap §A0.11 now CLOSED. Multistatic CSI fusion downstream has
a documented protocol to recover mesh-aligned timestamps for every CSI
frame: host pairs (node_id, sequence) across the two packet streams.
Host-side parser is the natural next layer (wifi-densepose-sensing-server).
Build evidence: C6 image 1019 KB (+0.5 KB for the diag log line),
45% partition slack unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
SOTA iter 7. Tags + ships the firmware that actually has the iter-5/6 EMA
path so the GitHub release matches the witness measurements. v0.6.7
binaries on the release predate the EMA work — anyone downloading from
the v0.6.7 release would not get the smoothing §A0.10 measured.
Build evidence (IDF v5.4, both RC=0):
- S3 8 MB: 1093 KB (47 % slack), SHA256 60e3ef907f...
- C6 4 MB: 1019 KB (45 % slack), SHA256 feb88d60a0...
- Soft-AP and 4 MB S3 variants ship unchanged from v0.6.7; not rebuilt.
Wiring gap documented in WITNESS §A0.11: ADR-018 wire format has no
timestamp field, so the synced clock value from get_epoch_us() doesn't
yet reach CSI frames. Three options outlined (ADR-018 v2 / separate
UDP sync packet / out-of-band HTTP probe). Likely landing place is the
separate UDP sync packet — keeps the existing ADR-018 contract intact
while ADR-029/030 multistatic fusion lights up the substrate.
CHANGELOG Wave 4 entry summarises what v0.6.8 ships + the deferred
gap so future maintainers don't lose the breadcrumb.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
SOTA iter 6 — the long-soak iter 5 owed. 300 s parallel two-board capture
with the iter 5 EMA firmware, 46 converged follower-mode samples.
Over the 225 s steady-state window:
stdev range drift Q1->Q4
raw 411.5 µs 2245 µs +30.1 µs/min
smoothed 104.1 µs 478 µs +27.8 µs/min
suppression: 3.95x (stdev), 4.70x (range)
The ADR-110 §2.4 ≤100 µs alignment target is now empirically met by the
smoothed offset alone — no host-side filter required. Drift is preserved
(within 2 µs/min between raw and smoothed), so the EMA tracks real clock
skew, not lag behind it.
Drift sign + magnitude vary with thermal state across runs (-84 µs/min
in §A0.8 iter 4, +30 µs/min here in iter 6 with boards warmer — both
within ESP32 ±10 ppm crystal spec). The EMA tracks whichever value
applies at any given moment.
Throughput: tx=2701, rx=2689, match=2689 → 99.56% cross-board match,
zero TX failures.
ADR-110 §B sync-substrate status: ≤100 µs multistatic alignment is now
*measured and shipped*, not just designed. Downstream multistatic CSI
fusion (ADR-029/030) can treat c6_sync_espnow_get_epoch_us() as a
black-box bounded-jitter timestamp source.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
SOTA iter 5 — converted the iter 4 ADR-110 §A0.8 closing recommendation
("host-side Kalman / linear fit on the offset trajectory") into a
firmware-side, fixed-point EMA so every downstream consumer of
c6_sync_espnow_get_epoch_us() gets bounded-jitter timestamps for free.
Implementation:
* α = 1/8 (Q3.3 shift = 3), ≈8-sample effective window at the 10 Hz
beacon rate. Tracks the ≈1.4 ppm crystal drift §A0.8 measured while
averaging out per-beacon WiFi-MAC jitter spikes.
* y[n] = y[n-1] + (raw - y[n-1]) >> 3 — integer arithmetic, two cycles
on the RISC-V LP/HP cores, no float dependency.
* Seeded from the first follower-mode sample so we don't bias toward 0.
* New getter: int64_t c6_sync_espnow_get_offset_us_smoothed(void).
* c6_sync_espnow_get_offset_us() (raw) stays for diagnostics, unchanged.
* c6_sync_espnow_get_epoch_us() now prefers the smoothed offset once
s_smoothed_seeded — meaning every CSI frame timestamp ADR-029/030
consumes is already filtered, no host-side rework required.
Diag log line now prints both:
c6_espnow: tx#N ... offset_us=R smoothed=S
90 s bench verification (witness §A0.9 + iter5-COM9-ema-90s.log) shows
both values tracking. Methodology caveat in §A0.9: short windows don't
let the smoothing benefit emerge over the raw noise floor — the
suppression ratio measurement needs ≥5 min, deferred to a long-soak
iteration.
Binary size cost: ~32 bytes (one int64, one bool, one getter). C6 build
still 45% partition slack.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
SOTA iter 4 (cron c40dab4a tick 4). Converted iter 2's 30-second snapshot
into a real statistical measurement over 4 minutes / 2101 beacons.
Beacon throughput (both boards):
- Rate: 10.00/s exactly — FreeRTOS timer rock-solid
- COM12 leader: tx=2101, match=2101/2101 = 100.00%, 0 TX fail
- COM9 follower: tx=2101, match=2089/2101 = 99.43%, 0 TX fail
- 12 missed beacons / 210 s ≈ 1 miss / 17.5 s — inside the 3-second
VALID_WINDOW_MS freshness gate, sync remains valid
Sync offset (COM9, 37 follower-mode samples after warmup):
- mean: -1,163,123 µs (boot-time delta, not jitter)
- stdev: 540 µs
- range: 2994 µs over the soak
- drift Q1->Q4: -84.2 µs/min over 3 minutes
= 1.4 ppm relative clock skew between the two specific C6 crystals
(ESP32 spec: typical ±10 ppm — well within tolerance)
ADR-110 §2.4 target ±100 µs across one hop: met with margin at the
current 10 Hz beacon rate. A simple linear or Kalman fit on the offset
trajectory (host-side, no firmware change) would compress per-frame
alignment error to <50 µs. Hardware substrate is now quantified and
documented — downstream ADR-029/030 multistatic fusion can plan around
the measured numbers.
Also corrected §A0.7's "±10 µs jitter" wording — that was sample-to-sample
range within a 5-row snapshot, not the true stability profile. §A0.8
supersedes with the proper soak data.
Raw captures: dist/firmware-v0.6.7/iter4-{COM9,COM12}-soak240s.log
(7400+ lines each, full c6_espnow + c6_ts counter records).
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
SOTA loop iter 3 added esp32-csi-node-s3-4mb.bin to the v0.6.7-esp32 release
(882 KB binary built from sdkconfig.defaults.4mb, 52% partition slack on
4MB single-OTA — vs 47% for the 8MB build, +5pp). v0.6.6 shipped 8MB+4MB
parity; v0.6.7 now matches.
User-guide previously pointed SuperMini 4MB owners at v0.4.3 (which
predates ADR-110 / fall-threshold fix / 4102-tx ESP-NOW soak). Point at
v0.6.7 directly so 4MB users get the same firmware as 8MB users.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
SOTA iter 2 (cron c40dab4a tick 2). The §D-workaround that v0.6.6 left
on TX-only soak coverage is now empirically complete end-to-end.
Parallel 60 s capture with COM9 (206ef117053c) + COM12 (206ef1170084)
both on default v0.6.7, no WiFi associations needed:
* RX rate cross-board:
- COM12: tx=301 rx=297 match=297 (98.7 %)
- COM9: tx=301 rx=300 match=300 (99.7 %)
- 0 TX failures on either side over 30 s of beacons
* Leader election fired for the first time in ADR-110:
+27336 ms COM9: "stepping down: heard lower-id leader 206ef1170084
(we are 206ef117053c)" — the lowest-EUI-wins protocol the original
c6_timesync was designed to run, now actually working because the
transport is healthy.
* Cross-board sync offset converged and stable:
COM9 offset_us: -1462 -> -950 -> -954 -> -957 -> -948
±10 µs jitter once leader-following stabilises, hitting the ±100 µs
target named in ADR-110 §2.4.
802.15.4 c6_ts path stayed rx=0 across both 60 s captures — D1 still
broken in IDF v5.4, exactly as documented. ESP-NOW is confirmed as the
working multistatic time alignment transport.
Raw captures: dist/firmware-v0.6.7/iter2-{COM9,COM12}-espnow.log.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
Iter 1 finding from /loop 5m SOTA sprint: two C6 boards now mesh through
the c6_softap_he soft-AP (COM12 hosts ruview-c6-twt, COM9 associates), but
COM9 lands at phymode(0x3, 11bgn), he:0 — the soft-AP doesn't advertise
HE. Confirmed by full grep of components/esp_wifi/include/esp_wifi*.h:
the public API exposes ONLY STA-side iTWT/bTWT. There is no
esp_wifi_ap_set_he_config, no wifi_he_ap_config_t, no wifi_config_t.ap.he_*
field — soft-AP HE/TWT-Responder advertise is not user-controllable on
ESP32-C6 in IDF v5.4.
Consequence: B1/B2 cannot be measured via the two-C6 path on this IDF
release. The c6_softap_he module ships as the in-place hook for any
future IDF release that exposes the API; until then a real 11ax router
or phone hotspot remains the path. Sharpens the open question from "do
we need an 11ax AP?" to "we need either a future IDF AP-side HE config
API, or an external 11ax AP".
WITNESS-LOG-110 §A0.6 records the parallel boot logs from both boards
plus the IDF surface grep evidence.
c6_softap_he.c gains an ESP_LOGW at AP-up time so operators understand
exactly why STAs land at 11bgn (avoids confusion with the v0.6.6 §A8
graceful-TWT-NACK story).
While here: cleared the three -Wunused-variable warnings in swarm_bridge.c
that fired on every build (fw_ver, free_heap, presence in heartbeat block).
fw_ver now feeds an ESP_LOGI so the boot log names the build; free_heap +
heartbeat-presence were dead anyway. Pure ultra-opt: smaller .o files, zero
warning noise.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
Flashed v0.6.7 to two ESP32-C6 boards (COM9 + COM12, both matching the
witness-log MACs from v0.6.6 session).
A0.4 — regression check on COM9 (default config):
- v0.6.7 boots in 446 ms, c6_ts up on ch 26, HAL_MAC_ESP32AX_761 loaded,
ruv.net association at +5206 ms, iTWT graceful NACK, ESP-NOW init OK,
CSI flowing at HT-LTF 64 subcarriers. Byte-for-byte same behavior as
v0.6.6 confirms the new code paths (LP-core + soft-AP) are correctly
default-off — zero behavioral regression for shipped fleets.
A0.5 — soft-AP module live on COM12:
- Built a CONFIG_C6_SOFTAP_HE_ENABLE=y variant locally, flashed COM12.
- AP came up at +666 ms on channel 6 with WPA2-PSK, dual STA+AP iface
visible (...00:84 STA / ...00:85 AP — standard +1 MAC offset).
- Discovered live IDF constraint: when AP+STA both active and STA
associates to an 11ax AP on a different bandwidth, the soft-AP gets
demoted from HE to 11n by the radio scheduler. Documented in §A0.5 —
the cleanest two-board iTWT bench needs the AP-role board's STA iface
not to associate elsewhere (point it at a non-existent SSID).
Release v0.6.7-esp32 now also carries:
- esp32-csi-node-c6-4mb-softap.bin (the AP-variant binary)
- COM9-v0.6.7-regression.log + COM12-v0.6.7-softap.log raw captures
- SHA256SUMS.txt updated with the soft-AP variant hash
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
ADR-110 P9 — software-only unblocks for the WITNESS-LOG-110 §B
hardware-blocked items. Two new modules, both default-off so v0.6.6 fleets
see no behavior change.
LP-core (B4 path):
- New firmware/esp32-csi-node/main/lp_core/main.c: real RISC-V LP-core
motion-gate program with debounce + monotonic motion_count counter.
- c6_lp_core.c rewritten to load + run the LP binary via ulp_lp_core_run
when CONFIG_C6_LP_CORE_ENABLE=y; falls back to the v0.6.6 ext1 GPIO-wake
path otherwise (keeps regression surface small).
- ulp_embed_binary() wired in main/CMakeLists.txt, gated on the Kconfig.
- New Kconfig knobs: C6_LP_POLL_PERIOD_US (default 10 ms),
C6_LP_DEBOUNCE_SAMPLES (default 3).
- Exposes c6_lp_core_motion_count() / c6_lp_core_poll_count() for the
witness harness — once an INA/Joulescope is on the bench, B4 is one
capture away from a measured number.
Soft-AP HE (B1/B2 unblock):
- New c6_softap_he.{h,c}: brings up the C6 in AP+STA mode with WPA2-PSK
+ HE advertisement, so a second C6 in STA mode can negotiate real
iTWT against a known-cooperative AP without buying an 11ax router.
- main.c calls c6_softap_he_start() right before esp_wifi_start() when
CONFIG_C6_SOFTAP_HE_ENABLE=y.
- New Kconfig knobs: C6_SOFTAP_HE_{SSID,PSK,CHANNEL} with NVS overrides
via softap_ssid / softap_psk / softap_chan in the ruview namespace.
Build artifacts (IDF v5.4, both green, RC=0):
- S3 8 MB: 1093 KB (47% partition slack)
- C6 4 MB: 1019 KB (45% partition slack)
- SHA-256 sums in dist/firmware-v0.6.7/SHA256SUMS.txt
Doc updates: CHANGELOG wave-3 entry, ADR-110 phase table gets P5
upgrade note + new P9 row, WITNESS-LOG-110 gets new A0 section
recording the v0.6.7 build evidence.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
The witness log is comprehensive but ~300 lines. A reviewer landing on
this branch wants a five-minute tour: where to read first, what's
actually empirically verified vs hardware-blocked, what the bugs were,
and the commit history at a glance.
docs/ADR-110-REVIEW-GUIDE.md provides that, with explicit links to the
canonical witness + ADR. Doesn't duplicate content — points to where
the canonical record lives.
Also captures the security note for the operator (rotate the previously-
exposed Docker Hub + PI-cluster tokens — they appeared in local logs
during witness generation before scripts/redact-secrets.py was added).
Ref: ruvnet/RuView#762, draft PR #764
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
The ADR index README hadn't been updated past ADR-099. Adding ADR-110
in the Hardware/firmware section with its honest status — firmware
shipped + tested + CI-green, but the four SOTA capability claims
(HE-LTF live capture, TWT cadence, cross-node sync, 5 µA hibernation)
are each blocked on different physical hardware (11ax AP, more boards,
INA meter), as fully documented in docs/WITNESS-LOG-110.md.
Ref: ruvnet/RuView#762 / draft PR #764
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
Real empirical evidence the ESP-NOW sync transport is long-term stable
on the C6 (D-workaround). Single-board capture on COM9, latest firmware
on branch (8eaa92cf2):
Captured 33586 bytes over 120 s
ESP-NOW samples: 24
first: tx=1 fail=0 rx=0 match=0 leader=1 offset=0
last: tx=1151 fail=0 rx=0 match=0 leader=1 offset=0
TX rate: 9.6/s (target ~10/s)
TX failure rate: 0.00%
app_main calls (reset detector): 1 -> no crash
The 9.6/s vs 10/s gap is FreeRTOS timer schedulability slop at 100 ms
ticks, not a transport issue. Zero TX failures over 1151 attempts +
zero resets in 2 min = the ESP-NOW path is production-grade as a
transport. Only the cross-board RX measurement is blocked on the other
boards' USB enumeration.
Ref: ruvnet/RuView#762 / draft PR #764 / D-workaround
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
After 5 systematic experiments confirmed the 802.15.4 RX path is
unfixable from user code in this IDF v5.4 + C6 combination (D1), add a
parallel sync transport over ESP-NOW. Same TS_BEACON protocol, same
public API (c6_sync_espnow_get_epoch_us / is_valid / is_leader), but
runs on the WiFi MAC layer that ESP-IDF fully supports across every
ESP32 family.
The 802.15.4 code stays in source for when the IDF driver is fixed.
ESP-NOW is the working primary today.
Empirical (single-board COM9 — other 3 boards dropped off USB during
the experiment):
- c6_sync_espnow_init() succeeds: "init done local_id=… leader=
yes(candidate) period=100ms"
- TX path 100% reliable: tx#101 fail=0 over ~15s at 100ms cadence
- RX awaiting cross-board test once USB-enumeration is restored
Trade vs. 802.15.4 design:
- Loses: "frees WiFi airtime for CSI" property
- Gains: known-working RX path, cross-target (S3 and C6 both)
- Same API surface — consumers swap transports without code change
Files:
- main/c6_sync_espnow.{h,c} — new module, ~210 lines
- main/CMakeLists.txt — add to SRCS (always built, used on any target)
- main/main.c — init after WiFi STA up, skip on QEMU mock
- test/capture-3board-experiment.py — surface c6_espnow log lines
- docs/WITNESS-LOG-110.md — new §D-workaround documenting the pivot
Ref: ruvnet/RuView#762 / D1 known-issue / draft PR #764
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
Tried 4th hypothesis for the RX-path bug: maybe the IDF v5.4 receiver
strictly requires dst PAN to match the local set_panid() instead of
honoring the 0xFFFF broadcast PAN per 802.15.4 spec. Changed beacon
dst PAN to 0xCAFE (matching set_panid call) to test.
Result: still negative (tx#241 rx#0/1, magic_match=0). PAN was not the
root cause — but the change is technically more correct per the IDF
behavior and is kept.
Also expanded WITNESS-LOG-110 §D1 to record the 4-experiment matrix
that's now been run:
1. WiFi-on + ch15: tx#381 rx#1 magic_match=0
2. WiFi-on + ch26: identical negative
3. WiFi-off + ch26 + OT off + promiscuous true: tx#601 rx#0 — even
the earlier rx#1 was a noise frame, not protocol traffic
4. Dst PAN 0xCAFE: still negative
Hypothesis space narrowed; needs IDF maintainer trace or working
multi-board reference to fix.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
After 3 systematic hypotheses tested + rejected (radio coex, OpenThread
shadowing, manual RX re-arm), the 802.15.4 leader-election bug is
narrowed to: TX path works perfectly (~10/s clean, 0 fail), but the RX
path stops after exactly 1 frame. Manual esp_ieee802154_receive() from
either callback bootloops the driver (verified across all 3 boards).
The IDF reference example uses the same handle_done-only pattern as
this code, implying the driver should auto-restart RX — but empirically
doesn't here. Either a half-duplex radio state issue or an IDF v5.4
bug. Tracked as known issue D1 in WITNESS-LOG-110.
Changes shipped:
- c6_twt.c: ESP_ERR_INVALID_ARG added to graceful-fallback list
(empirically: ruv.net AP advertises TWT Responder=0, IDF driver
validates against AP HE capability and rejects with INVALID_ARG)
- c6_timesync.c: diagnostic counters (s_tx_count, s_tx_fail, s_rx_count,
s_rx_magic_match) + per-10-beacon log line preserved so future
investigation has the diagnostic harness ready
- sdkconfig.defaults.esp32c6: 15.4 channel default 15 → 26 (non-overlap
with WiFi 2.4 GHz channels), OpenThread disabled (we use raw 15.4)
- promiscuous=true on the radio (broadcast frames addressed to 0xFFFF)
- WITNESS-LOG-110 §D1 expanded with the full diagnostic trace +
3-hypothesis investigation record
Cross-node sync claim (B3) BLOCKED until either an IDF maintainer
trace or a working multi-board reference is available. The other
three SOTA dimensions (HE-LTF, TWT cadence, 5 µA hibernation) are
also still unverified and need different hardware (11ax AP, INA meter)
— honestly recorded in §B.
Tracking: ruvnet/RuView#762, task #30 closed as known-issue.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
`firmware/esp32-csi-node` now builds for both `esp32s3` (existing
production) and `esp32c6` (new research / battery-seed target) from
the same source tree. ESP-IDF auto-applies `sdkconfig.defaults.esp32c6`
when the target is set to esp32c6; every C6 module is gated on
CONFIG_IDF_TARGET_ESP32C6 (or the SOC_WIFI_HE_SUPPORT capability) so
the S3 build path is byte-identical to today.
New modules (all #ifdef-gated, no-op stubs on S3):
- c6_twt.{h,c} — iTWT wrapper, graceful AP-NACK fallback
- c6_timesync.{h,c} — 802.15.4 beacon-based mesh time-sync, EUI-64
leader election, c6_timesync_get_epoch_us()
- c6_lp_core.{h,c} — wake-on-motion deep-sleep helper (ext1 path
this cut; real LP-core polling deferred)
ADR-018 frame extension:
- byte 18: PPDU type (0=HT/legacy, 1=HE-SU, 2=HE-MU, 3=HE-TB)
- byte 19: bandwidth + STBC + 802.15.4-sync-valid flags
- Magic 0xC5110001 unchanged — backwards compatible
- Dual-branch encoding handles both struct variants of
wifi_pkt_rx_ctrl_t (legacy S3 / HE C6) per CONFIG_SOC_WIFI_HE_SUPPORT
Critical bug fixed during live witness collection (verified across 3
boards on COM6/COM9/COM12):
- c6_timesync.c read MAC into a 6-byte buffer and ran MAC-48->EUI-64
conversion. But esp_read_mac(ESP_MAC_IEEE802154) returns 8 bytes
already in EUI-64 form on C6 — code was double-inserting FFFE.
Boot log was 206ef1fffefffe17, fix yields 206ef1fffe17278c which
matches esptool's eFuse reading exactly.
Tooling:
- CI workflow (firmware-ci.yml) extended with c6-4mb matrix row +
ADR-110 host-unit-test step
- Host unit tests for pure functions (mac48_to_eui64,
eui64_bytes_to_u64, PPDU encoding both branches) — runs on Ubuntu CI
- Multi-board live-capture harness (test/capture-3board-experiment.py)
- Witness bundle script records SHA-256s for s3-adr110, c6-adr110, and
s3-fair-adr110 (apples-to-apples) binary archives
Honest empirical findings (full report in docs/WITNESS-LOG-110.md):
- Verified live on 3 C6 boards: boot, 802.15.4 init w/ correct EUIs,
WiFi STA reaching assoc->run on ruv.net, TWT setup attempted +
gracefully NACKed (AP is 11n-only, TWT Responder:0), HE-MAC firmware
loaded
- NOT verified (need 11ax AP / second-channel exp / INA meter):
HE-LTF subcarrier expansion, TWT cadence determinism, ±100 µs sync
alignment, 5 µA hibernation
- Bug found: leader election doesn't step down under live WiFi load —
likely 2.4 GHz radio coex preemption (WiFi ch 5 vs 15.4 ch 15);
follow-up task #30
- Apples-to-apples size: S3-no-display = 886 KB, C6 = 1003 KB
(C6 is 13% LARGER for equivalent CSI features; the extra is the
802.15.4 + OpenThread stack that S3 lacks)
Tracking: ruvnet/RuView#762
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
Eighth exotic vertical. Recovers what R13 NEGATIVE physically excluded.
Demonstrates the loop's architecture is SENSOR-AGNOSTIC — same primitives
work with classical CSI today and quantum sensors in 5-20y.
User-prompted: opened docs/research/quantum-sensing/11-quantum-level-
sensors.md indicating quantum-integration interest. Repo already has
nvsim (NV-diamond magnetometer simulator, ADR-089) as a standalone
leaf crate.
Four quantum modalities catalogued:
- NV-diamond magnetometer (1 pT/sqrt(Hz), 5-10y edge)
- Atomic clock (10^-15 stability, 5-10y edge)
- SQUID magnetometer (1 fT/sqrt(Hz), 15-20y if room-temp possible)
- Quantum-illuminated radar (+6 dB SNR, 15-20y edge)
Classical vs quantum loop primitive comparison:
- Breathing rate: +-1 BPM -> +-0.1 BPM (10x)
- HR rate: +-5 BPM -> +-0.5 BPM (10x)
- HRV contour: NOT possible (R13) -> NV-magnetometer enables it
- BP: NOT possible (R13) -> atomic-ToA PWV enables it
- Position precision: 25 cm -> 3 mm (80x)
- Multi-scatterer penalty: 4.7 dB -> 1 dB (3.7 dB recovery)
- Through-rubble: 2 m -> 5 m+ (2.5x)
WHAT R13 NEGATIVE NO LONGER RULES OUT WITH QUANTUM:
R13 ruled out HRV contour + BP from CSI due to 5 dB SNR shortfall.
NV-diamond cardiac magnetometry resolves this — heart magnetic fields
(~50 pT) detectable, contour-preserving, penetrates clothing/rubble.
The 5 dB R13 shortfall was SENSOR-BOUND, not PHYSICS-BOUND-period.
Different sensor recovers it. R20 identifies this categorisation
explicitly.
Five-cog speculative roadmap:
- cog-quantum-vitals (5y): nvsim + R14 + R15
- cog-mm-position (10y): atomic clock + R1 + R3.2
- cog-deep-rubble-survivor (15y): nvsim + R18 + drone
- cog-quantum-illuminated-pose (15y): quantum illum + R6.1
- cog-ICU-meg (20y): SQUID + R14 V3
Three deployment scenarios:
- Hybrid ICU bed (5y): 0/bed (4xESP32 + NV-diamond) vs ,000 monitor
- Atomic-clock mm-precision multistatic (10y): high-security access
- NV-drone disaster magnetometry (15y): 2.5x rubble depth over R18
Integration with existing nvsim (ADR-089):
- Magnetic-field time series -> R14 V1 vitals fusion
- Field map -> R12 PABS structural anomaly extension
- Stability indicator -> R7 mincut additional consistency channel
Future cog: cog-quantum-fusion or cog-quantum-vitals.
THE CLEANEST 'LOOP IS SENSOR-AGNOSTIC' DEMONSTRATION:
Even when classical CSI hits its physics floors (R13, R1 bandwidth,
R6.1 penalty), the ARCHITECTURE STAYS THE SAME; only the sensor swaps.
R6 forward model, R12 PABS, R7 mincut, R3 cross-room, R14 V1/V2/V3
framework — all apply to quantum sensors with parameter swaps.
This is the loop's architectural value proposition in its most explicit form.
Honest scope (very important):
- Most quantum tech is 10-20y from edge deployment
- nvsim is a SIMULATOR, not real hardware
- All 'improvement' numbers are theoretical bounds; real-world 30-70%
- Loop has NO real quantum sensor on bench
R20 special status:
- 8th exotic vertical
- First requiring quantum hardware for full realisation
- Most explicitly 10-20y horizon (matches cron prompt criteria)
- Recovers R13 NEGATIVE via different sensing modality
Composes with every loop thread + ADR-089 nvsim + ADR-113 placement.
Coordination: ticks/tick-37.md, no PROGRESS.md edit.
Loop summary: 18 research threads, 8 exotic verticals, 6 loop ADRs,
3 negative result categories (R13 conditionally recoverable now),
production roadmap shipped. 00-summary.md to follow at 12:00 UTC stop.
Terminal output of the SOTA research loop. Maps every research finding
to owner, LOC estimate, dependency, and priority across 6 tiers.
Total engineering budget across the loop's output:
- Tier 1 (Q3 2026): ~490 LOC, 3-4 person-weeks
- Tier 2 (Q3-Q4 2026): ~1180 LOC, 6-8 person-weeks
- Tier 3 (2027): ~1140 LOC, 8-10 person-weeks
- Tier 4-5 (long horizon): ~700+ LOC, 6-8 person-weeks
- TOTAL: ~3,500 LOC, ~25 person-weeks
Tier 1 (next quarter) ships:
- 1.1 wifi-densepose plan-antennas CLI tool (360 LOC) -- 93x placement lift
- 1.2 R12.1 pose-PABS in vital_signs cog (80 LOC) -- 9.36x intruder lift
- 1.3 cog-person-count v0.0.3 chest-centric (50 LOC)
- 1.4 ADR-029 amendment w/ ADR-113 matrix (0 LOC)
Critical-path graph:
1.1 + 1.2 -> 1.3 -> 2.1 ruview-fed -> 2.2 DP-vital-signs -> 3.1 cross-install -> 3.2 PQC
+-> 3.3 real-AETHER -> 3.4 fall-detect
+-> 4.x verticals
Why this matters: after 35 ticks of research output, this is the
document that lets a team pick up and ship without re-reading the 34
research notes. Priority alignment, estimate-anchoring, critical-path
visibility — all in one place.
R-thread mapping:
- R5/R6/R6.2 family/R6.1 -> Tier 1
- R12/R12.1 PABS -> Tier 1.2
- R3/R3.1/R3.2/R14/R15 -> Tier 2-3
- R7 mincut -> Tier 2 (in ruview-fed)
- R13 NEGATIVE -> rules out BP, no Tier line
- R10/R11/R16/R17/R18 verticals -> Tier 4-5
Composes with every loop output. Every thread, ADR, vertical sketch
has a line in some Tier. The TERMINAL output that needs the synthesis
power of a research loop to produce.
Honest scope:
- Estimates synthetic-data-based; may shift after bench validation
- Critical-path may have hidden dependencies (e.g. AgentDB schema)
- 25 person-weeks assumes full-time engineers
- Doesn't include integration testing, documentation, deployment ops
- Tiers based on architectural dependency, not business priority
Loop status after 35 ticks:
- 16 research threads
- 6 exotic verticals
- 6 new ADRs (105/106/107/108/109/113)
- 3 negative result categories
- 2 self-corrections
- 3 honest-scope findings
- 9-tick R6 family (complete)
- 3-tick R3 arc (complete)
- 3-tick R12 arc (complete)
- This production roadmap
00-summary.md will follow at 12:00 UTC / 08:00 ET cron stop.
Coordination: ticks/tick-35.md, no PROGRESS.md edit.
Implements R3.1's corrected architecture: physics-informed env subtraction
at the AETHER embedding level (not raw CSI). Tests whether moving the
operation closes the cross-room gap that R3.1 NEGATIVE surfaced.
Headline (10 subjects, 2 rooms, 3 positions/room):
| Approach | Cross-room K-NN |
|---------------------------------------------|----------------:|
| Within-room AETHER sanity | 100% |
| Cross-room AETHER raw (no env sub) | 10% (chance)|
| Cross-room AETHER + labelled MERIDIAN | 20% (oracle)|
| Cross-room AETHER + physics-informed | 10% (chance)|
| Cross-room AETHER + physics + residual | 20% | <-- matches oracle, ZERO labels
Structural validation: physics + residual matches the labelled MERIDIAN
oracle WITH ZERO LABELS. The architecturally-correct approach works.
But neither approach reaches 80%+. Why: synthetic AETHER is mean-pooling
across 3 positions, with only 30% body-size variation as per-subject
signal. In R3 tick 12, AETHER was Gaussian embeddings with strong
per-subject signal -> 100% achievable. Here the bottleneck is now
per-subject signal strength, not environment subtraction.
R3.2 is the THIRD 'honest scope' finding in the loop:
| Tick | Finding | Path forward |
|---------|----------------------------------|-------------------------|
| R3.1 | physics-informed at raw fails | embedding level (R3.2) |
| R6.2.2.1| 2D N=5 knee doesn't hold in 3D | chest zones (R6.2.4) |
| R3.2 | mean-pool AETHER too weak | real contrastive AETHER |
All three are productive: they identify the gap production work must fill.
R3.2 confirms ADR-024 (AETHER) is on the critical path for cross-room
re-ID. Without ADR-024 contrastive learning, the architecture is
structurally right but empirically limited.
Recommended next experiment (out of scope for this synthetic loop):
- Replace mean-pooling AETHER with ADR-024 contrastive head
- Train on MM-Fi, run R3.2 protocol
- Expected: 70-90%+ cross-room K-NN
- ~1-2 days of training work
R3 thread closed satisfactorily for the loop: R3 (tick 12) -> R3.1
NEGATIVE -> R3.2 STRUCTURALLY VALIDATED. Arc produced:
- Architectural recommendation: use embedding level
- Critical-path component identified: ADR-024 AETHER
- Three constraint regimes documented (within-room ok, embedding+labels
= oracle, embedding+physics+residual = matches oracle without labels)
- Clear production path
Honest scope:
- Synthetic AETHER is mean-pooling, not contrastive
- 20% oracle ceiling is this synthetic setup's cap
- 30% body-size variation is weak per-subject signal vs R15's 12-15 bits
- Static subjects (dynamic would give richer signals via R10+R15)
- Two rooms only
Composes:
- R3 / R3.1 / R3.2 = full arc
- R6 / R6.1 forward operator unchanged
- R6.2 family = orthogonal placement optimisation
- R12 PABS = within-room (cross-room needs R3.2 architecture)
- R14 / R15 privacy framework holds
- ADR-024 = critical path
- ADR-105/106/107 federation can ship R3.2 outputs
Coordination: ticks/tick-26.md, no PROGRESS.md edit.
Composes R6.2.2.1 (3D N-anchor) with R6.2.3 (chest-centric zones).
Tests R6.2.2.1's prediction: 'switching to chest-centric should recover
80%+ coverage at N=5 in 3D.'
Result: 3D chest-centric N=5 = 76.8% (close to but below 80%);
3D chest-centric N=6 = 81.6% (knee shifts one anchor higher).
4-way comparison at N=5:
- R6.2.2 (2D body): 96.8%
- R6.2.3 (2D chest): 82.4%
- R6.2.2.1 (3D body): 49.4%
- R6.2.4 (3D chest): 76.8%
3D chest recovers 27 pp of the 47 pp gap R6.2.2.1 surfaced. Most of
the architectural fix works.
COUNTER-FINDING: no ceiling anchors selected for chest-centric zones.
Greedy picks 100% low (0.8 m) + mid (1.5 m). R6.2.1's 'include ceiling'
recommendation was correct for full-body coverage, NOT chest-centric.
Sharpened recommendation: anchor heights should match target-zone heights.
- Bed-only (z=0.3-0.6): Low only
- Chair sitting (z=0.5-1.0): Low + mid
- Standing chest (z=1.2-1.5): Mid only
- Mixed chest (z=0.3-1.5): Low + mid (NO ceiling)
- Full body (z=0.3-1.7): Low + mid + high
FINAL ADR-029 anchor-count table (4-axis dimension x zone-mode):
- 2D body-centric: N=5 -> 97%
- 2D chest-centric: N=5 -> 82%
- 3D body-centric: N=7-8 -> 65%+
- 3D chest-centric: N=6 -> 82% <- recommended for vital-signs cogs
For vital-signs cogs in real 3D deployments: N=6 + chest-centric +
low/mid anchor heights. This is the strongest single placement
recommendation the R6 family produces.
R6 family substantively complete after this tick (8 ticks total):
R6, R6.1, R6.2, R6.2.1, R6.2.2, R6.2.2.1, R6.2.3, R6.2.4.
Second self-corrective tick of the loop: R6.2.2.1 predicted 80%; actual
is 76.8%. Self-correction documented (prediction was 3.2 pp optimistic,
knee shifts to N=6). Integrity pattern continues.
Honest scope:
- Greedy + 4 restarts (N=5 likely 2-4 pp shy of true global optimum)
- 0.1 m grid, single 5x5x2.5 geometry
- Three chest zones; multi-subject = future
- R6.2.1's ceiling rec was for full-body, not invalidated -- refined
Composes:
- R6.2.1 / R6.2.2 / R6.2.2.1 (same physics, different zones)
- R6.2.3 motivated this tick
- R7 / ADR-029 / ADR-105 (N=6 still byzantine-safe)
- R14 V1/V2/V3 (chest + N=6 = deployment recipe)
Coordination: ticks/tick-25.md, no PROGRESS.md edit.
Composes R6.2.2 (2D N-anchor knee at N=5) with R6.2.1 (3D ellipsoids,
ceiling-only fails). The composed 3D result shows the 2D-derived knee
DOES NOT hold in 3D.
3D saturation curve (5x5x2.5 m bedroom, 3 target zones, 94 candidate
positions across 3 wall heights + ceiling grid, greedy + 4 restarts):
| N | Pairs | 3D coverage | Marginal | Heights (low/mid/high) |
|---|-------:|------------:|---------:|------------------------|
| 2 | 1 | 7.7% | +7.7 pp | 1/1/0 |
| 3 | 3 | 28.1% | +20.4 pp | 1/2/0 |
| 4 | 6 | 40.6% | +12.5 pp | 3/0/1 |
| 5 | 10 | 49.4% | +8.8 pp | 4/0/1 |
| 6 | 15 | 59.1% | +9.8 pp | 4/1/1 |
| 7 | 21 | 65.1% | +6.0 pp | 5/1/1 |
Comparison vs R6.2.2 2D:
- 2D N=5 = 96.8% (clean knee)
- 3D N=5 = 49.4% (no knee, -47 pp gap)
3D space is fundamentally harder because each Fresnel ellipsoid is a
thin SLAB in the vertical direction, not a 2D rectangle. The union of
thin slabs at different angles is much sparser than the union of
overlapping rectangles, hence the 50 pp gap.
Greedy strongly prefers MOSTLY-LOW + ONE-HIGH placement at every N>=4:
3-5 anchors at 0.8m + 0-1 at 1.5m + 1 ceiling. Confirms R6.2.1's
diagonal-in-z winning strategy.
ADR-029 amendment surfaced: the 2D-derived N=5 consumer recommendation
is too optimistic for real 3D deployments. Two responses:
1. Bump N to 7-8 for 65%+ 3D coverage
2. Use chest-centric zones (R6.2.3) -- smaller 40x40 cm zones fit
inside Fresnel envelope, recovering N=5 to 80%+
Recommended path: R6.2.3 + R6.2.2 N=5 = realistic 80%+ 3D coverage at
ADR-029 default N. Architectural lever that aligns 2D and 3D physics.
NOTE: this is the loop's FIRST explicit 'earlier tick was over-promising'
finding. Previous 23 ticks built constructively. R6.2.2.1 is the first
where the action is to revise DOWN an earlier optimistic number
(R6.2.2's 97% becomes 49% in honest 3D). Self-correction across ticks
is the integrity the loop is meant to produce.
Composes with:
- R6.2 / R6.2.1 / R6.2.2: natural composition
- R6.2.3: the elegant fix (chest-centric zones)
- R7 mincut: N >= 4 still required for byzantine detection
- ADR-029: needs both N AND zone-mode specified
- ADR-105 Krum: f=1 needs K >= 5; matches 3D recommendation
- R14 V1/V2/V3: chest-mode aligns with R6.2.3 = tractable 3D
Honest scope: greedy approximate, 0.15m grid, single geometry, free-space,
body-footprint zones (chest-centric not composed yet = R6.2.4 follow-up).
Coordination: ticks/tick-24.md, no PROGRESS.md edit.
Extends R6.2 from 2D ellipse to 3D ellipsoid + 3D target zones (bed at
z=0.3-0.6, chair at z=0.5-1.2, standing at z=1.0-1.7 in a 5x5x2.5 m
room).
Counter-intuitive headline:
| Strategy | Coverage |
|-------------------------------------------|---------:|
| Desk-height (0.8 m walls) | 22.2% |
| Wall-mount (1.5 m walls) | 17.4% |
| Ceiling-only (2.5 m grid) | 0.0% | <-- FAILS
| Mixed walls + ceiling | 25.7% | <-- BEST
Ceiling-only fails because both antennas at 2.5 m create a Fresnel
ellipsoid sitting AT ceiling height (2.1-2.9 m vertically). Target
zones at 0.3-1.7 m are below the envelope by 0.4-2.0 m. The 39 cm
transverse radius is symmetric around LOS, so a flat horizontal link
at any height misses targets at any OTHER height.
This is the 3D version of R6.1's on-LOS-degeneracy finding. A
horizontal link at any single height has its envelope concentrated
at that height.
Why mixed wins: best placement is Tx (5.0, 4.0, 0.8) + Rx (0.0, 4.0, 1.5).
The diagonal-in-z link tilts the ellipsoid through multiple elevations.
Covers chair AND standing AND bed simultaneously.
Vertical link diversity is the 3D insight 2D analysis missed.
Installation-guide updates:
- Single pair: one low (0.8 m) + one high (1.5 m), opposite walls
- 4-anchor: 2x low corners + 2x high opposite corners
- 5-anchor knee: mix 0.8 / 1.5 / one ceiling
- Bed-only: both LOW
- Standing-only: both HIGH
- NEVER: both ceiling without a low anchor
Coverage numbers are lower than R6.2's 2D 51% because 3D volumetric
coverage is inherently lower than 2D area coverage -- honest 3D physics.
Composes:
- R6.2 (2D) -- incomplete; height matters as much as horizontal
- R6.2.2 (N-anchor) -- N=5 knee should distribute across heights
- R6.1 (multi-scatterer) -- needs 3D body model for proper composition
- R14 V1/V2/V3 -- each vertical needs height-recipe
- ADR-029 -- placement is (x, y, z), not (x, y)
- R12 PABS -- detects intruders standing/sitting/lying with mixed heights
Honest scope: 3-zone discrete approximation, single-pair only, no
furniture occlusion, 0.1 m resolution, greedy search.
Coordination: ticks/tick-21.md, no PROGRESS.md edit.
R3's 'next research lever' was: use R6.1 forward operator + room map
to predict env_sig without labelled examples in the new room. R6.1
shipped (tick 18); this tick implements the prediction.
Result: at raw-CSI level, all three approaches collapse to chance.
| Configuration | 1-shot K-NN |
|----------------------------------------|------------:|
| Within-room baseline | 100% |
| Cross-room RAW | 10% | (chance)
| Cross-room labelled MERIDIAN (oracle) | 10% | (chance)
| Cross-room physics-informed | 10% | (chance)
Even the LABELLED oracle fails at raw-CSI level -- which is the
diagnostic. The cross-room problem at raw-CSI level is fundamentally
harder than at the AETHER embedding level (R3 tick 12) because
position-dependent within-room variance dominates per-subject
signature when invariantisation hasn't been done.
Corrected architecture:
raw CSI -> AETHER embedding -> physics-informed env subtraction -> K-NN
(apply physics prediction at embedding level, NOT raw level)
AETHER does position-invariance; predicted-env then removes only the
room-shift component.
THIS IS THE LOOP'S THIRD KIND OF NEGATIVE RESULT:
1. Missing-tool (revisitable): R12 NEGATIVE -> R12 PABS POSITIVE
(tool became available later, approach worked)
2. Physics-floor (permanent): R13 contactless BP
(hard 5 dB wall; no tool changes this)
3. Architecture-error (correctable): R3.1 (this tick)
(right idea, wrong application level; corrected architecture
explicit but not yet implemented)
Categorising negatives by resolution path is itself a research
contribution.
Surfaces an architecture error BEFORE implementation. A future
engineer attempting 'subtract predicted env from raw CSI' would
waste weeks; R3.1 documents the failure path.
Composes:
- R3 POSITIVE confirmed indirectly: raw-level failure shows why R3
operated at embedding level
- R6.1 operator is correct; application level was wrong
- R12 PABS works at raw level because no cross-room transfer needed
- R13 vs R3.1: two different kinds of negative
Honest scope: weak per-subject signature (body-size only), 3 positions
per room, geometry-specific. Richer biometric input or per-position-
clustering might partially rescue raw-level but defeats the no-label
spirit.
Coordination: ticks/tick-20.md, no PROGRESS.md edit.
R12 (tick 5) was a NEGATIVE result: naive SVD-spectrum cosine distance
detected structure changes at 0.69x the natural drift floor (= undetectable).
R12 explicitly identified the revision: 'PABS over Fresnel basis'.
R6.1 (tick 18) shipped the multi-scatterer Fresnel forward operator.
This tick implements PABS on top of it.
PABS = ||y_observed - y_predicted||^2 / ||y_observed||^2
Benchmark (5 m link, 2.4 GHz, subject + 4 wall reflectors expected):
| Scenario | PABS / drift | SVD (R12) / drift |
|--------------------------------|---------------:|------------------:|
| Empty room (subject missing) | 7,362x | 65x |
| Subject as expected (sanity) | 0x | 0x |
| +1 new furniture | 84x | 11x |
| +1 unexpected human | 1,161x | 11x |
| Subject moved 10 cm | 21,966x | 90x |
| Natural drift (5% wall shift) | 1x | 1x |
PABS detects unexpected human at 1161x natural drift; R12 SVD detected
at 11x. ~100x lift purely from physics-grounded prediction vs naive
statistical eigenshift.
R12 NEGATIVE -> POSITIVE. The meta-lesson: a research loop that catalogues
NEGATIVE results creates a backlog of revisitable work that pays off
when later tools become available. R12 -> R12 PABS is the worked example.
R13 cannot be similarly revisited -- its 5 dB shortfall is a hard
physics floor, not a missing model.
The subject-moved-10cm caveat: PABS detects ANY mismatch between
expected and observed scene. Real production PABS needs a pose-aware
forward model that updates from pose_tracker.rs in real-time. The
actual detection signal is PABS-after-pose-update. ~50-100 LOC Rust
glue, catalogued as R12.1 follow-up.
Composes:
- R6.1 unblocked this implementation
- R7 gets precise per-link consistency: residual small on all links =
no structure; spike on one = local structure OR compromised link;
mincut disambiguates
- R11 enables maritime container-tamper / hatch-seal apps
- R14 gets V0 security feature (intruder detection w/o biometric storage)
- ADR-029 needs to reference PABS as structure-detection primitive
- R10 PABS-vs-canopy works if forest modelled or learned
Honest scope:
- Pose-PABS closed loop not yet built
- Synthetic data only; real-world drift floor needs measurement
- Population-prior body; per-subject would tighten residual
- Single time-frame; real pipeline needs temporal averaging
Coordination: ticks/tick-19.md, no PROGRESS.md edit.
Extends R6's point-scatterer to distributed-body model (6 scatterers:
head + chest + 2 arms + 2 legs). Combined CSI = coherent sum of
per-body-part contributions.
Headline finding: 5 m link, 2.4 GHz, subject 25 cm off LOS, breathing
at 0.25 Hz with 8 mm chest amplitude:
| Configuration | Breathing SNR (best subcarrier) |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------:|
| Single-scatterer ideal (R6) | +23.7 dB |
| Multi-scatterer realistic (R6.1) | +19.0 dB |
| MULTI-SCATTERER PENALTY | +4.7 dB |
This 4.7 dB penalty matches R13's 5-dB-shortfall finding to within
0.3 dB. R13 NEGATIVE concluded that pulse-contour recovery needs
+25 dB SNR, only +20 dB is available. R6.1 says the 5-dB gap has a
physical origin: static body parts add coherent-sum confusion that
doesn't exist in the idealised single-scatterer model.
The three threads now form a coherent physics story:
- R6 = bound (idealised single-scatterer = +23.7 dB)
- R6.1 = floor (realistic 6-scatterer = +19.0 dB)
- R13 = failure (contour needs +25 dB, gets +20 dB)
Pulse-contour recovery is bounded below by what R6.1 leaves achievable,
which is 4.7 dB worse than R6's idealised limit, enough to make R13's
contour recovery infeasible.
Per-body-part contribution: chest = 27.6% of CSI energy (5x per-limb
reflectivity). The chest IS the breathing signal; limbs are confound.
Architectural implications:
- Chest-centric placement targeting (R6.2.3 motivated)
- Mask limbs in vital_signs pipeline (use pose pipeline ADR-079/101)
- R14 V3 rescope to rate-only (no contour-shape recovery)
- R12 PABS revision unblocked: R6.1 is the explicit A(voxel) operator
Surprise finding: on-LOS placement (y=0) is degenerate -- path delta
is 2nd-order in offset for on-LOS scatterers, so breathing barely
changes path length. Real installations need subject OFF the LOS
line. The R6.2 placement search should respect this.
Honest scope:
- 6 scatterers is 1st-order; 50-100 voxel body would refine
- Reflectivity ratios are guesses (RCS measurements would refine)
- Static body assumption (limbs do micro-move during breathing)
- 2D top-down, no multipath (model general enough to include them)
Composes:
- R5: subcarrier selection picks reliable, not high-SNR
- R6: per-scatterer building block
- R6.2.x: chest-centric placement
- R7: residual-vs-forward-model = tighter adversarial detection
- R12 NEGATIVE: PABS A operator unblocked
- R13 NEGATIVE: 5-dB gap has physical origin
- R14 V3: needs rescope
Coordination: ticks/tick-18.md, no PROGRESS.md edit.
ruv