Extends R6.2 from single-pair to N-anchor placement search via union of all C(N,2) pairwise Fresnel ellipses. Greedy + K=8 random restarts. Saturation curve on 5x5 m bedroom (3 target zones: bed + chair + desk, 40 wall-candidates, 434 grid points, 2.4 GHz): | N | Pairs | Coverage | Marginal | |---|------:|---------:|---------:| | 2 | 1 | 35.7% | +35.7 pp | | 3 | 3 | 63.4% | +27.6 pp | | 4 | 6 | 86.2% | +22.8 pp | | 5 | 10 | 96.8% | +10.6 pp | <- knee | 6 | 15 | 100.0% | +3.2 pp | | 7 | 21 | 100.0% | +0.0 pp | Practical knee at N=5. Past this, diminishing returns. Three regimes: - Single-feature (presence): 2-3 anchors (36-63%) - Multi-feature (pose+vitals+count): 4-5 anchors (86-97%) - Mission-critical (medical): 6 anchors (100%) - Beyond 6: wasted Cost-optimisation: Cognitum Seed BOM is 9-15 USD. The 4->5 anchor jump buys +10.6 pp coverage; the 5->6 jump buys only +3.2 pp for the same cost. Consumer recommendation: 5 anchors. Commercial / medical: 6. Convenient numerology: N=5 simultaneously satisfies three other constraints: 1. R7 multi-link mincut: needs N >= 4 for single-anchor-compromise detection 2. ADR-105 federation Krum: f=1 byzantine tolerance requires K >= 5 3. R6.2.2 coverage knee: 5 hits practical saturation These all bound by similar inverse-square-of-geometry scaling, so the alignment is not coincidental. ADR-029 (multistatic) didn't specify anchor counts; R6.2.2 fills that gap with a benchmark-backed number. Honest scope: single 5x5m geometry tested, 2D still (R6.2.1 = 3D not yet built), free-space (multipath adds +5-15% beyond Fresnel), greedy with 8 restarts approximates global optimum to 1-2 pp. Composes with: - R6/R6.2 (direct generalisation) - R7 (mincut needs N>=4) - R1 (placement x precision = full geometry budget) - ADR-029 (architectural recommendation now has a number) - ADR-105 (Krum bound matches) - R10, R11, R14 (other geometries / use cases) Coordination: ticks/tick-17.md, no PROGRESS.md edit. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| environment | ||
| happiness-vector | ||
| medical | ||
| research-sota | ||
| sleep | ||
| stress | ||
| three.js | ||
| README.md | ||
| ruview_live.py | ||
README.md
Examples
Real-time sensing applications built on the RuView platform.
Unified Dashboard (start here)
pip install pyserial numpy
python examples/ruview_live.py --csi COM7 --mmwave COM4
The live dashboard auto-detects available sensors and displays fused vitals, environment data, and events in real-time. Works with any combination of sensors.
Individual Examples
| Example | Sensors | What It Does |
|---|---|---|
| ruview_live.py | CSI + mmWave + Light | Unified dashboard: HR, BR, BP, stress, presence, light, RSSI |
| Medical: Blood Pressure | mmWave | Contactless BP estimation from HRV |
| Medical: Vitals Suite | mmWave | 10-in-1: HR, BR, BP, HRV, sleep stages, apnea, cough, snoring, activity, meditation |
| Sleep: Apnea Screener | mmWave | Detects breathing cessation events, computes AHI |
| Stress: HRV Monitor | mmWave | Real-time stress level from heart rate variability |
| Environment: Room Monitor | CSI + mmWave | Occupancy, light, RF fingerprint, activity events |
Hardware
| Port | Device | Cost | What It Provides |
|---|---|---|---|
| COM7 | ESP32-S3 (WiFi CSI) | ~$9 | Presence, motion, breathing, heart rate (through walls) |
| COM4 | ESP32-C6 + Seeed MR60BHA2 | ~$15 | Precise HR/BR, presence, distance, ambient light |
Either sensor works alone. Both together enable fusion (mmWave 80% + CSI 20%).
Quick Start
pip install pyserial numpy
# Unified dashboard (recommended)
python examples/ruview_live.py --csi COM7 --mmwave COM4
# Blood pressure estimation
python examples/medical/bp_estimator.py --port COM4
# Sleep apnea screening (run overnight)
python examples/sleep/apnea_screener.py --port COM4 --duration 28800
# Stress monitoring (workday session)
python examples/stress/hrv_stress_monitor.py --port COM4 --duration 3600
# Room environment monitor
python examples/environment/room_monitor.py --csi-port COM7 --mmwave-port COM4
# CSI only (no mmWave)
python examples/ruview_live.py --csi COM7 --mmwave none