wifi-densepose/docs/research
rUv 40e5a4d6f2
adr-108: Kyber post-quantum key exchange for cross-installation federation (#731)
Closes the quantum-resistance gap explicitly deferred from ADR-107.
Final ADR in the privacy + federation chain.

Replaces DH key exchange in ADR-107's Layer 4 secure aggregation with
Kyber-768 KEM (NIST FIPS 203, CNSA 2.0 default).

Migration timeline:
- Phase 0 (NOW 2026): Classical X25519 (ADR-107 default)
- Phase 1 (2026-Q4 -> 2027): Kyber-768 opt-in via --enable-pqc flag
- Phase 2 (2027-Q2 -> 2028): Hybrid (X25519 + Kyber-768) becomes default
- Phase 3 (2030+): Pure Kyber-768 (classical retired)

Why hybrid for Phase 2 (belt-and-braces):
- Protects against future Kyber breaks (Kyber is ~5 years old)
- Protects against classical breaks (X25519 backup)
- Protects against implementation bugs in either primitive
- Cost: ~3 kB/round/installation extra (negligible)

Why now (record-now-decrypt-later):
Adversaries can record federated updates today and decrypt them in
2035 when quantum capabilities arrive. Without ADR-108, the (epsilon,
delta) guarantees of ADR-106 silently expire when quantum computers
arrive. Proactive migration is cheap insurance.

Why Kyber-768 (not 512 or 1024):
- NIST FIPS 203 (2024); ~AES-192 equivalent
- CNSA 2.0 recommended default
- Used by Cloudflare, Google, AWS in 2024-2026 rollouts
- Public key 1184 B, ciphertext 1088 B, secret 32 B
- 512 lacks CNSA 2.0 sign-off; 1024 doubles bandwidth without benefit

LOC: +220 on top of ADR-107.
Total federation budget ADR-105+106+107+108: ~1,550 LOC.

Threat model: 8 threats, every row has mitigation. Hybrid mode is
the belt-and-braces against both Kyber breaks AND classical breaks.

ADR CHAIN COMPLETE: 7 ADRs in the privacy + federation chain:
ADR-100 (cog packaging) -> ADR-103 (cog example) -> ADR-104 (MCP/CLI)
-> ADR-105 (within-installation federation) -> ADR-106 (DP + isolation)
-> ADR-107 (cross-installation + SA) -> ADR-108 (PQC key exchange).

No remaining unspecified privacy gap at any threat horizon (classical
or quantum).

Future ADRs catalogued:
- ADR-109: PQC signatures (Dilithium replaces Ed25519 in ADR-100)
- ADR-110: PQC hardware acceleration on Cognitum-v0
- ADR-111: PQC for cog-store distribution

Composes:
- R3 / R14 / R15 / R7 / R12 PABS: privacy chain intact through quantum transition
- R10 / R11 (long-deployment): benefit most from forward secrecy as data ages

Honest scope:
- Kyber ~5 years old; hybrid mitigates uncertainty
- 'When do we need this?' uncertain (2030 aggressive / 2050+ conservative)
- ESP32-S3 timing ~10 ms per handshake estimated negligible; needs measurement
- Phase 3 retirement of classical needs future decision

Coordination: ticks/tick-28.md, no PROGRESS.md edit.
2026-05-22 05:45:32 -04:00
..
architecture docs(research): three-tier Rust node design + 2026-Q2 SOTA survey + decision tree 2026-04-25 20:41:14 -04:00
arena-physica feat: ADR-069 ESP32 CSI → Cognitum Seed RVF pipeline (v0.5.4-esp32) 2026-04-02 19:32:18 -04:00
neural-decoding feat: ADR-069 ESP32 CSI → Cognitum Seed RVF pipeline (v0.5.4-esp32) 2026-04-02 19:32:18 -04:00
quantum-sensing feat(nvsim): full simulator stack — Rust crate, dashboard, server, App Store, Ghost Murmur [ADR-089/090/091/092/093] 2026-04-27 12:41:01 -04:00
rf-topological-sensing chore(repo): rename rust-port/wifi-densepose-rs → v2/ (flatten to one level) (#427) 2026-04-25 21:28:13 -04:00
sota docs(research): three-tier Rust node design + 2026-Q2 SOTA survey + decision tree 2026-04-25 20:41:14 -04:00
sota-2026-05-22 adr-108: Kyber post-quantum key exchange for cross-installation federation (#731) 2026-05-22 05:45:32 -04:00
sota-surveys feat: ADR-069 ESP32 CSI → Cognitum Seed RVF pipeline (v0.5.4-esp32) 2026-04-02 19:32:18 -04:00