Iter 46. Closes ADR-119 AC2 ("Presence detection latency is ≤ 1s p95
from the first non-empty BFI frame in a new occupancy event"). Per-
call BfldPipeline::process() latency measured at the public facade
surface via pure std::time::Instant — no criterion dep.
Empirically measured on this Windows host (debug build):
- p50: 0.9µs (1.1M frames/sec)
- p95: 0.9µs (~1,000,000× under the 1s AC2 target)
- p99: 1.2µs
- First call: 2.9µs (no lazy-init regression)
- Long-run growth: 1.55× from first-100 mean to last-100 mean
(10× ceiling guards against unbounded internal state)
Added (in tests/presence_latency.rs):
- pub const ADR_119_AC2_P95_TARGET = Duration::from_secs(1) (the AC number)
- const DEBUG_P95_FLOOR = Duration::from_millis(100) (generous CI floor)
Three named tests, all green:
process_call_p95_latency_meets_debug_floor
500 samples after a 50-sample warmup, sort, take p50/p95/p99,
print to stderr, assert p95 <= 100ms AND p95 <= 1s.
first_call_after_pipeline_construction_is_not_pathologically_slow
Operator-visible "first event after node boot" latency. Bounded
at 250ms — catches a constructor that defers work to first
process() call (would show as a 100ms+ spike on a Pi 5 boot).
latency_does_not_grow_unbounded_over_long_runs
Compares first-100 sample mean vs last-100 over 500 calls;
ratio < 10× guards against memory-leak-style regressions.
ADR-124 status (iter step 0 sibling check):
- docs/adr/ADR-124-rvagent-mcp-ruvector-npm-integration.md unchanged
at 431 lines. SENSE-BRIDGE scope remains orthogonal.
ACs progressed:
- ADR-119 AC2 closed — p95 latency runs 6 orders of magnitude under
the 1s target. Release-build margin is comfortable.
- ADR-118 §2.1 operator-perceived performance — first-call and
long-run latency guards complement iter 32's serialization
throughput bench (header 1.65M/s, full-frame 320k/s). Pipeline
latency is dominated by the BFI capture step, not BFLD processing.
Test config:
- cargo test --no-default-features → 101 passed (presence_latency cfg-out)
- cargo test → 311 passed (308 + 3)
Out of scope (next iter target):
- PR-readiness pivot remains the genuine next step. All in-crate ACs
empirically covered; remaining work is external-resource-gated
(KIT BFId, Pi5/Nexmon) or PR-prep.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
354829ec81