7b7dbc7980
feat(adr-124/pseudocode): Zod schema barrel for all 20 ADR-124 §4.1+§4.1a tools
...
Advances SPARC Phase 2 (Pseudocode) — typed schemas are the language-level
design artifact that defines the complete tool surface before any HTTP/WS
plumbing is written. The schema map + TOOL_NAMES catalog are the pseudocode
contract that Phase 3 (Architecture) wires to the MCP Server dispatch loop.
New files under tools/ruview-mcp/src/schemas/:
common.ts — shared Zod sub-schemas
NodeIdSchema, DurationSSchema (max 3600 s), WindowSSchema (max 300 s),
SemanticPrimitiveKindSchema (10 ADR-115 primitives enum), PosePersonResultSchema
(17-keypoint COCO array + confidence + optional AETHER person_id)
tools.ts — 20 input schemas + TOOL_NAMES catalog + TOOL_INPUT_SCHEMAS dispatch map
§4.1 sensing (15): presence.now, vitals.get_{breathing,heart_rate,all},
pose.{latest,subscribe}, primitives.{get,list_active,subscribe},
bfld.{last_scan,subscribe}, node.{list,status},
vector.{search_pose,store_pose}
§4.1a policy (5): policy.{can_access_vitals, can_query_presence,
can_subscribe, redact_identity_fields, audit_log}
index.ts — barrel re-export of both modules
New test: tests/schemas.test.ts (24 assertions)
- Catalog completeness: exactly 20 tools, all §4.1 + §4.1a names present,
TOOL_INPUT_SCHEMAS one-to-one with catalog (no extras)
- Happy-path parse: 11 representative schemas accept valid inputs
- Constraint rejection: 8 schemas reject invalid inputs (empty NodeId,
DurationS=0 / >3600, unknown primitive, wrong keypoint length, k>100,
unknown vital, missing required node_id)
Fix: use Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty instead of Jest toHaveProperty for
dotted-key names (Jest interprets dots as nested path separators).
Test results: 50/50 PASS (schemas ×24 + manifest ×10 + tools ×5 + validate ×11)
Build: tsc clean, zero errors.
ACs touched: ADR-124 §4.1 complete tool surface; §4.1a policy layer surface;
Phase 2 gate: pseudocode covers all acceptance criteria from spec.
Next iter target: Phase 3 (Architecture) — wire TOOL_INPUT_SCHEMAS into the
MCP Server CallTool handler as a uniform validation gate; add Streamable HTTP
transport scaffold with Origin-validation middleware (option C).
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
2026-05-24 21:56:52 -04:00
d11ca9c31e
feat(adr-124/packaging): rename to @ruvnet/rvagent 0.1.0 + manifest test (ADR-124 §2)
...
Advances SPARC Phase 1 (Specification) for ADR-124 SENSE-BRIDGE by establishing
the correct npm package identity that all subsequent implementation iters depend on.
Changes:
- tools/ruview-mcp/package.json
- name: @ruv/ruview-mcp → @ruvnet/rvagent (ADR-124 §2.1)
- version: 0.0.1 → 0.1.0 (initial publishable milestone)
- removed private:true so the package is publishable (ADR-124 §2.6)
- bin: added rvagent key alongside legacy ruview-mcp alias (ADR-124 §2.4)
- exports: added "." entry with import+types keys for ESM+CJS dual output (ADR-124 §2.5)
- files: added README.md and CHANGELOG.md slots (ADR-124 §5 npm publish plan)
- keywords: expanded with sense-bridge, rvagent, ruvnet
- repository / homepage / bugs: wired to github.com/ruvnet/RuView
- tools/ruview-mcp/src/index.ts
- SERVER_NAME: "ruview" → "rvagent"
- PACKAGE_VERSION: "0.0.1" → "0.1.0"
- stderr log prefix: [ruview-mcp] → [@ruvnet/rvagent]
- tools/ruview-mcp/tests/manifest.test.ts (NEW)
- 10 ADR-124 §2 acceptance-criterion assertions, all green
- Guards name, version >=0.1.0, engines.node >=20, bin.rvagent, exports structure,
publishConfig.access, @modelcontextprotocol/sdk dep, zod dep, ESM type, license
Test results: 26/26 PASS (manifest.test.ts ×10 + tools.test.ts ×5 + validate.test.ts ×11)
Build: tsc clean, zero errors.
Next iter target: (A) Zod schema barrel for the 15+5 tool catalog from ADR-124 §4.1/4.1a
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
2026-05-24 21:50:22 -04:00
2a2f16a380
feat(ruview-mcp): M3+M4 — schema validation + train_count wired ( #708 )
...
- Add validate.ts: validateCsiWindow (56×20 shape) + validateSensingLatestResponse
(schema_version 2 pin per ADR-101); returns actionable errors on schema drift
- Wire csi-latest.ts: call validateSensingLatestResponse after every sensingGet;
return {ok:false,warn:true,raw_response,...} on mismatch so agents can inspect
- Fix csi-latest.ts: subcarriers now reads amplitudes.length (not hardcoded 56)
- Add tests/validate.test.ts: 5+5 = 10 tests covering valid, null, wrong shape,
schema_version 3, missing captured_at, window error propagation
- All 16 tests pass (validate × 10 + tools × 6); build clean
2026-05-22 00:03:19 -04:00
3f462a254d
feat(tools): scaffold ruview MCP server + CLI + ADR-104 ( #705 )
...
Adds two new npm packages that expose RuView's WiFi-DensePose
sensing capabilities outside the Cognitum appliance ecosystem:
- tools/ruview-mcp/ (@ruv/ruview-mcp) — MCP server with 6 tools:
ruview_csi_latest, ruview_pose_infer, ruview_count_infer,
ruview_registry_list, ruview_train_count, ruview_job_status.
Uses @modelcontextprotocol/sdk with stdio transport.
6/6 smoke tests pass. TypeScript strict mode, Node 20.
- tools/ruview-cli/ (@ruv/ruview-cli) — Yargs CLI with matching
subcommands: csi tail, pose infer, count infer, cogs list,
train count, job status. Same fail-open pattern as the cog
binaries (WARN to stderr, exit 0 on unavailable sensing-server).
- docs/adr/ADR-104-ruview-mcp-cli-distribution.md — design rationale,
6-row threat table, packaging plan, acceptance gates, failure modes.
- docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/HORIZON.md — 12-hour horizon plan
with 7 milestones tracked (M1 complete in this commit).
Both packages are private:true pending the user's publish decision.
Inference is via subprocess to the signed cog binaries (ADR-100/101/103)
— no JS/WASM ML engine bundled.
2026-05-21 23:33:18 -04:00
ruv