Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ruv 70bf9e41fe docs(adr-150): subject-scaling study — capture diversity, not volume
Measured cross-subject PCK vs N training subjects: 4->8 = +21pts, but
24->32 = +0.45pt. Saturates ~64%, ~19pt below in-domain. Correction to
'more data': subject-count returns vanish past ~16-20; the residual is
device/room/protocol shift. Re-scope phase-1 capture around DIVERSITY
(rooms/devices/protocols) + few-shot target adaptation, not headcount.

Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
2026-05-31 01:43:49 -04:00
ruv 5d1fb48eb5 docs(adr-150): empirical cross-subject findings — pose-contrastive pretrain refuted
Measured all near-term levers on the official MM-Fi cross-subject split:
- mixup+TTA+ensemble = best at 64.92% (+0.9 over doc 64.04)
- pose-contrastive foundation pretrain: estimated +5..+12, MEASURED -2.3
  (SupCon loss pinned at ln(B) across K/BS/seeds -> same-pose CSI is not
  contrastively alignable across subjects)
- instance-norm+SpecAugment -4.6; CORAL/DANN ~0

Conclusion: the 18-pt in-domain<->cross-subject gap is fundamental subject
shift, not algorithmic. Promotes multi-subject data collection to the primary
lever; recommends re-scoping ADR-150 phase 1 around capture.

Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
2026-05-31 00:33:43 -04:00
ruv 046b2564b8 feat(aether-arena): publish RuView MM-Fi SOTA result + ADR-150 RF Foundation Encoder
- Ledger witness row (seq 1, Gold): RuView CSI-Transformer 81.63% torso-PCK@20 on
  MM-Fi random_split, exceeding MultiFormer 72.25% (CSI2Pose 68.41%) — protocol- and
  metric-matched, self-corrected from inflated 91.86% bbox. Hash-chained, verifiable.
- HF Space updated with the controlled SOTA claim + caveat (cross-subject is the frontier).
- Proof/replay/witness gist: gist.github.com/ruvnet/af2fbc1c7674dddf09c15509b3c7f785
- Tracking issue #876 (result + Generalization Track roadmap).
- ADR-150: RuView RF Foundation Encoder — pose-preserving, subject/room/device-invariant
  SSL embedding (masked CSI + pose-contrast-across-subjects + coherence head); the
  principled attack on the cross-subject frontier. DANN failed; this is the corrected design.

Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
2026-05-30 19:55:58 -04:00