2 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
ruv	5d1fb48eb5	docs(adr-150): empirical cross-subject findings — pose-contrastive pretrain refuted ... Measured all near-term levers on the official MM-Fi cross-subject split: - mixup+TTA+ensemble = best at 64.92% (+0.9 over doc 64.04) - pose-contrastive foundation pretrain: estimated +5..+12, MEASURED -2.3 (SupCon loss pinned at ln(B) across K/BS/seeds -> same-pose CSI is not contrastively alignable across subjects) - instance-norm+SpecAugment -4.6; CORAL/DANN ~0 Conclusion: the 18-pt in-domain<->cross-subject gap is fundamental subject shift, not algorithmic. Promotes multi-subject data collection to the primary lever; recommends re-scoping ADR-150 phase 1 around capture. Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>	2026-05-31 00:33:43 -04:00
ruv	046b2564b8	feat(aether-arena): publish RuView MM-Fi SOTA result + ADR-150 RF Foundation Encoder ... - Ledger witness row (seq 1, Gold): RuView CSI-Transformer 81.63% torso-PCK@20 on MM-Fi random_split, exceeding MultiFormer 72.25% (CSI2Pose 68.41%) — protocol- and metric-matched, self-corrected from inflated 91.86% bbox. Hash-chained, verifiable. - HF Space updated with the controlled SOTA claim + caveat (cross-subject is the frontier). - Proof/replay/witness gist: gist.github.com/ruvnet/af2fbc1c7674dddf09c15509b3c7f785 - Tracking issue #876 (result + Generalization Track roadmap). - ADR-150: RuView RF Foundation Encoder — pose-preserving, subject/room/device-invariant SSL embedding (masked CSI + pose-contrast-across-subjects + coherence head); the principled attack on the cross-subject frontier. DANN failed; this is the corrected design. Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>	2026-05-30 19:55:58 -04:00