Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ruv ca97527646 feat(introspection): I6 — regime-changed signal + per-frame analyze + honest ADR-099 D8 amendment
Three threads in this commit:

1) Per-frame attractor analysis (default analyze_every_n: 8 → 1).
   The I5 benchmark put per-frame update at 0.012 ms p99 — 83× under D4's
   1 ms budget. The cost case for the every-8th-frame default doesn't hold;
   per-frame analysis is what makes regime_changed a viable early-detection
   trigger.

2) New `regime_changed: bool` field in IntrospectionSnapshot — flips on any
   frame whose attractor regime classification differs from the previous
   frame's. Pairs with top_k_similarity (full-shape match) to give
   downstream consumers two latencies with different robustness profiles.

3) Honest amendment of ADR-099 D8 to reflect empirical reality:
   - L1 stand-in achieves 3.20× ratio (5-frame shape match vs 16-frame
     event-path floor); the 10× aspirational bar is architecturally
     unreachable at 1-D scalar feature resolution.
   - regime_changed didn't fire in the 10-frame motion window — the
     200-frame noise trajectory dominates the Lyapunov classification, and
     short perturbations don't shift the regime fast enough on a scalar
     feature.
   - Path to 10×: ADR-208 Phase 2 (Hailo NPU vec128 embeddings) — multi-dim
     partial matches discriminate from noise in 1-2 frames, not 5.
   - Side finding: midstream temporal-compare::DTW uses *discrete equality*
     cost (designed for LLM tokens), not numeric distance — swapping it in
     for f64 amplitude scoring would be strictly worse than the L1 stand-in.
     A numeric DTW is a separate concern (hand-roll or new crate).
   - Revised D8: ship behind --introspection (off by default) until multi-
     dim features land. Per-frame update budget IS met (0.041 ms p99 in this
     bench, ~24× under the 1 ms bar) — the feature is cheap enough to
     carry dark today.

cargo test -p wifi-densepose-sensing-server --no-default-features:
  introspection (lib): 8 passed, 0 failed
  introspection_latency (test): 5 passed, 0 failed (incl. new
                                 regime_change_path_latency)
clippy: clean on the introspection surface (pre-existing approx_constant
        lints in pose.rs / main.rs unchanged).

Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
2026-05-13 23:29:37 -04:00
ruv 900b877c64 docs(adr): ADR-099 — adopt midstream as RuView's real-time introspection + low-latency tap (Proposed)
ADR-098 rejected midstream as a *replacement* for RuView's existing seams.
ADR-099 is the other half: midstream's `temporal-compare` (DTW) and
`temporal-attractor-studio` (Lyapunov + regime classification) crates as a
*parallel* per-frame introspection tap, alongside the existing window-aggregated
event pipeline.

The 8 decisions:

  D1 — Only midstreamer-temporal-compare 0.2 + midstreamer-attractor 0.2;
       scheduler / neural-solver / strange-loop are out of scope of this ADR.
  D2 — Tap point: post-validate, parallel to WindowBuffer::push in csi.rs.
       The existing /ws/sensing path is unchanged.
  D3 — New /ws/introspection topic + /api/v1/introspection/snapshot REST endpoint
       carrying IntrospectionSnapshot { regime, lyapunov_exponent,
       attractor_dim, top_k_similarity }.
  D4 — Per-frame updates only, never window-blocked. Soonest-event latency on
       the "shape recognized" path collapses from ~533 ms (16-frame @ 30 Hz
       window) to ~33 ms (one frame), a ~16× win.
  D5 — temporal-neural-solver (LTL) is out of scope (separate MAT audit ADR).
  D6 — ESP32 firmware unchanged; deployment is host-side only.
  D7 — Signature library is JSON, on-disk, customer-owned; three reference
       signatures ship as developer fixtures.
  D8 — Promotion bar is empirical: ≥10× p99 latency reduction vs. the existing
       /ws/sensing event path, or the feature stays behind a CLI flag.

Indexed in docs/adr/README.md. Phased adoption (P0 spike + benchmark → P1 first
real signature library → P2 dashboard widget → P3 capture workflow → P4 optional
adaptive_classifier hook). Implementation lands as ~150–250 lines + one
integration test in v2/crates/wifi-densepose-sensing-server in follow-up PRs.

Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
2026-05-13 22:42:05 -04:00