feat(rufield): rufield-viewer live-ingest mode (submodule bump) (#1072)

Bumps vendor/rufield to add --source live --upstream: the dashboard ingests
RuView's /ws/field events, verifies each ed25519 receipt on ingest (forged
events flagged, never fused), and renders real RuView FieldEvents through the
same display path. Honest SYNTHETIC/LIVE/DISCONNECTED banner, mutually
exclusive, never mislabeled (409 on /api/run in live mode). Closes the
RuView↔RuField visual loop (ADR-262 surfaces). 26 tests, 0 failed.

Co-authored-by: ruv <ruvnet@gmail.com>

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
 ## [Unreleased]
 
 ### Added
+- **RuField `rufield-viewer` live-ingest mode — closes the RuView↔RuField visual loop (ADR-262 surfaces).** The dashboard gains `--source live --upstream <RuView-URL>`: it consumes RuView's `/ws/field` SSE (falling back to polling `/api/field`), **verifies every event's ed25519 provenance receipt on ingest** (`is_fusable`) — forged/tampered events are flagged ✗ and **never fused** into trusted inferences — and renders real RuView `FieldEvent`s through the same room-state/privacy-badge/fusion-graph/receipt path the synthetic mode uses (wire-compatible by construction: both sides use `rufield_core::FieldEvent` serde). **Strict banner honesty:** a single `BannerState` shows `SYNTHETIC` / `LIVE — <upstream>` / `DISCONNECTED — <upstream> unreachable`, mutually exclusive — never SYNTHETIC while showing live data or vice versa; live mode returns **409** on `/api/run` rather than fabricate a synthetic run, and starts DISCONNECTED until first verified contact. Default stays synthetic. 26 tests / 0 failed. `ruvnet/rufield` `crates/rufield-viewer`; `vendor/rufield` submodule bumped.
 - **ADR-262 P3 — live RuField surface: RuView's running sensing-server now speaks RuField on `/api/field` + `/ws/field`.** Wires the P1 `wifi-densepose-rufield` bridge into the live `wifi-densepose-sensing-server` (the bridge is the only added coupling, ADR-262 §5.4). A new `src/rufield_surface.rs` module (kept out of the 8k-line `main.rs`) holds a `FieldSurface` with a **dedicated ed25519 `Signer`**, a bounded ring buffer of recent signed events (`FIELD_RING_CAPACITY = 64`), and the `/ws/field` broadcast topic; it exposes `GET /api/field` (latest signed `FieldEvent`s + signer pubkey + a `dev_signing_key` flag) and `GET /ws/field` (per-cycle stream, mirroring `/ws/sensing`), plus a standalone `router()` for isolated testing. **Tap:** at the ESP32 governed-trust cycle (`main.rs` `observe_cycle` ~`:5886` / `SensingUpdate` build ~`:5938`), `emit_rufield_event` joins the cycle's real `SensingUpdate` (features/classification/signal_field) with the engine's recorded `effective_class`/`demoted` trust state into a `SensingSnapshot` and surfaces a signed `FieldEvent` — **existing endpoints (`/ws/sensing` etc.) are unchanged; this is purely additive.** **Signer (defers the P2 key decision, §8 Q1):** a **standalone dev/sensing key** from `WDP_RUFIELD_SIGNING_SEED` (64-hex or ≥32-byte value), else a deterministic dev default with a logged `WARN` — reusing the `cog-ha-matter` Ed25519 key is the deferred P2 call, so P3 does not pre-empt it. **Egress privacy (fail-closed):** `network_egress_allowed` is *stricter* than `DefaultPrivacyGuard` for an unattended live surface — only **P1/P2** leave the box; P0 (raw) and P3/P4/P5 are held edge-local, so a `Derived → P4/P5` cycle **never** surfaces; no-presence cycles emit **no phantom event**. **P3 acceptance gates (`tests/rufield_surface_test.rs`, 4 integration via `tower::oneshot` + 4 module unit, 0 failed):** a well-formed **signed** event (`Modality::WifiCsi`, P2 not P1, `is_fusable` ed25519-verified, real timestamp); empty cycle → no phantom; **privacy-safety** — an injected `Derived` trust never surfaces; a mixed stream surfaces only egress-safe events. **Honest scope (ADR-262 §0/§6):** real plumbing on a **live endpoint**, **NOT accuracy** — single-link CSI with its existing caveats (no validated room-coordinate accuracy — `field_localize`), a dedicated dev signing key pending the P2 ownership decision, no accuracy claim. The win is narrowly: "RuView's live sensing now speaks RuField on `/ws/field`."
 - **ADR-262 P1 — `wifi-densepose-rufield` anti-corruption bridge: RuView WiFi-CSI sensing → signed RuField `FieldEvent`s.** A new v2 workspace member (the *single coupling point* between RuView and the standalone RuField MFS spec, ADR-262 §5.4) that **path-deps** the `vendor/rufield` submodule crates (`rufield-core`/`-provenance`/`-privacy`/`-fusion` — pure-Rust, `--no-default-features`-buildable: serde/sha2/ed25519/toml only, no tch/openblas/ndarray/candle) and **no** RuView internal crate. The bridge takes owned primitives — `SensingSnapshot` mirrors the `/ws/sensing` `SensingUpdate` (features + classification + signal_field) joined with the `TrustedOutput` trust state (`trust_class`/`demoted`/`identity_bound`) — and `snapshot_to_field_event()` emits one **signed** `FieldEvent` (`Modality::WifiCsi`, axis `[Frequency]`): a real `FieldTensor` from the feature scalars with the real `timestamp_ns`; an `Observation` whose `range_m`/`motion_vector`/`space_cell` are derived from the strongest **signal-field peak** when present (else `None` — coordinates are **never fabricated**, per the `field_localize` caveat) and `confidence` from the classification; a real `ProvenanceRef` (sha256 over the tensor bytes, `synthetic=false`) **ed25519-signed** so `rufield_provenance::is_fusable` passes. **The §3.3 privacy mapping is the critical correctness item**, implemented as `map_privacy()` mapping RuView's class onto RuField P0–P5 **by information content, NEVER by byte value** and **fail-closed**: RuView `Derived` (byte `1`, which sorts *below* `Anonymous` byte `2`) carries an identity embedding → maps to **P4** (or **P5** if identity-bound), **never P1** (the single most dangerous mapping mistake); `Raw → P0`, `Anonymous → P2`, `Restricted → P2`; a governed-engine `demoted` cycle floors the egress class to ≥ P2 with raw suppressed. **P1 acceptance gates (15 tests / 0 failed — 5 unit + 9 integration + 1 doc):** round-trip (`SensingSnapshot → FieldEvent →` serde `→` equal), `is_fusable` (verified ed25519 receipt), `RuFieldFusion::ingest` accept + `infer()` runs, **privacy-safety** (`gate_privacy_safety_derived_never_maps_to_low_privacy` — `Derived → P4/P5`, never P1; a table test over every RuView class; fail-closed demotion), and determinism (same snapshot + same signer seed → byte-identical event). **Honest scope:** this is **P1 plumbing** — a tested conversion + a safe privacy mapping. It is **not** wired into the live server (that is P3) and makes **no accuracy claim** (RuField v0.1 is synthetic; RuView's single-link CSI carries its own caveats). CI: the `rust-tests` workflow checkout gains `submodules: recursive` so the path-deps resolve. Python deterministic proof unchanged (off the signal proof path).
 - **ADR-262 (Proposed): RuField MFS ↔ RuView integration — a live `SensingServerAdapter`, a privacy/provenance bridge, MAPPED not papered-over.** Researched integration design for wiring RuField into RuView. Recommends: a thin **`wifi-densepose-rufield` bridge crate** (anti-corruption layer, path-deps on the `vendor/rufield` submodule — the `vendor/rvcsi` pattern, since rufield crates are unpublished); a **live `SensingServerAdapter`** that taps the real `SensingUpdate` emit site joined with `TrustedOutput` trust state and emits one signed `FieldEvent`/cycle (the file-based `CsiReplayAdapter` stays for offline replay); **vertical fusion composition** (ruvsense fuses *within* WiFi → one `wifi_csi` event → rufield-fusion graph fuses *across* modalities above it); and **one canonical privacy/provenance model** (RuView `effective_class` is source-of-truth, mapped to RuField P0–P5 at egress; reuse the existing `cog-ha-matter` SHA-256+Ed25519 chain for the `ProvenanceReceipt`). **Key honest finding:** RuView has **two privacy enums + three witness mechanisms across two hash algorithms** that do not map 1:1 onto P0–P5, and a real trap — RuView's `Derived` privacy byte (`1`) sorts *below* `Anonymous` (`2`) yet carries identity embeddings, so the bridge must map by **information content** (`Derived → P4/P5`), never by byte value, or it would leak identity as low-privacy P1. 4 independently-shippable phases, each with a test gate (round-trip / `is_fusable` / privacy-monotonicity / ed25519-verify). Honest scope: this is **plumbing architecture, not accuracy** — RuField v0.1 is synthetic and RuView's only real-CSI path is unlabeled replay; the ADR claims only architecture, gated by round-trip/monotonicity/signature tests.

vendor/rufield

@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit ba66e2e0a6940a1aa11c7967f0bbeee5c45a2ab8
+Subproject commit 509d8ae29e654a322910bd504d325b0dd1fdd895